The Wrestling Game Forum

This thread is for complaints against the Forum Moderators of TWG.

To complain about a Mod fill out the following form:

Name of Moderator:
Reason(s) for complaint:
Thread(s) related to complaint:

Should the topic already be deleted, please state the name of the topic anyway and add the word "deleted"

The following rules apply to this topic:

1) Post in a mature and civilized manner (cursing and flaming are non constructive and will be deleted.) That applies to everyone alike.
2) It must be an actual complaint against a forum moderator.
3) Complaints will not be reviewed by the Mod you´re complaining about.
4) If a complaint is settled, it is deleted from this thread.
5) Only the plaintiff should be posting - these complaints aren't up for general discussion. The Forum supervisor or VA will deal with the situation and reply accordingly.


You can post your complaint in this thread, or send it to Joose2001 or Abdel via pm, if you don´t want it to be public for any reason.

Name of Moderator: Larry Zbyszko
Reason(s) for complaint: Flaming
Thread(s) related to complaint: s3-suggestion-question-t17571.html


The reason for this complaint is that Larry has a bad attitude.
As in his first reponse the "Suggestion" was to call it ridiculous which is going over the top to what is a valid "suggestion". I'm not up with what Maxolino and Tullo said 3 years ago. This response could have been worded in a way that didnt seem like i'd just insulted him with the "suggestion".

In his 2nd reply he wrote: "You have yet to give a viable reason other than "I fink dey shud b in feds cuz dere kool"." I never said that and nobody else on the post did either. I dont appreciate him putting words in my mouth. I gave a viable reason to my suggestion. And then to lock down the suggestion with no reson is not what I'd expect from a modorator or a 'long time' GM as he said he is.

In my opinion he has a negative attitude and in the other posts i've read that he has made its the same. THis does not show TWG forums or the game in a good light. I do not use forums that much and this doesnt make me want to use this forum again.

For the record, I'm not the one that closed the topic. If you look, Hardcore Boy was the last to comment on the topic and he locked it after someone asked about a royal rumble for the 8 millionth time.

Second of all, before you try putting all the blame at my door, let's not overlook what you had to say. Pointing out that an opinion and statement of fact from someone else was "itself ridiculous" because it didn't agree with your point of view, wasn't flaming in and of its own right?

You were given the option of WRITING matches, which is what people do in feds when there are matches they want to have that don't exist in the parameters of the coding. You didn't like that and wanted to talk about how they should be implemented, and damn the cost or the fact that it might completely slaughter a fed's plan for storylines. HCB said the exact same thing before the topic was locked.

You admit to "not being up on what was said three years ago." I am...I was a GM and a GML at that point in time when the decision was made. Again, just because you don't like the facts doesn't make them untrue. You didn't give a viable option for why ECs should be in feds other than because it can give angles for story lines...which can easily be done WITHOUT an EC. I clearly stated the following as to WHY it was a ridiculous idea:

"They come with a TP cost to enter, and the majority of the time they're crapshoots. No fed is going to want to have a title on the line via a randomly generated order that might reward an inactive player by ending up being the last man in."

Show me a fed that wants a guy that doesn't pull the weight holding the strap. That means you'd have to edit the match again, which defeats the purpose of having one...so why not write it from the beginning?

Finally, that was my THIRD post in the thread, and I also clearly pointed out that ECs are money making matches for TWG, and that having been a GM for two and a half years, and a GML twice, I have a lot more background in how things work in feds than most. I went on to say that trip threat, 3WD and ECs "are things that are extremely unlikely to be seen."

but you called his point riddiculous first, he was obviously responding in kind it seems. be it mature or not he's not the staff member here.



i pointed out in that thread that 3 man fed matches were being considered for a time though recently and that came from maxolino himself so the point of his post was not entirely unworthy of making.

anyway im only weighing in here because i was part of that topic and i also complained of your attitude in that topic to the authorities to no response so perhaps this topic wil lget a response.
its also not a good idea as i see it to argue the original topic again when he is complaining of your treatment of him and attitude in general as a staff member. that is the issue here not what you think of his idea again. basically the point is you could have said what you wanted to say without insulting and belittling him.

Hello,

I'll just add a small note here

Unless you have an actual complaint yourself, you aren't allowed to post in here, so mind breaking the rules please or you might get warned.

And since when did you get to hear from Maxo directly. Please don't impute fake announcements/quots to staff members. The Idea of 3 men fed matches was never considered by an admin, so be aware of what you are stating.

Ive read everything I need to and have nothing further to say from what Larry and Abdel have previously posted.


I have seen NO insults at all, just facts of why it wouldnt work and ways around it.

About Larrys "attitude".... its the way he is, to the point and doest tiptoe around things.
If he actually did have a attitude towards players, he would not be a GML on two servers and a mod as well in the chat rooms.
People say he has an attitude as he tells it like it is and people dont like that, but thats nothing to do with an "attitude" at all.

Name of Moderator: Unknown
Reason(s) for complaint: Unanswered complaint moved to the Dead Zone
Thread(s) related to complaint: complaint-on-forum-moderation-proceedures-t18011.html

I have been waiting since Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:05 pm for an answer to a serious complaint I wrote a while back, and when I checked it today, now it is in the Dead Zone? Not sure when that happened, but I would love to hear some official feedback (My preference would be something that does not accuse me of Q.Q.-ing, which seems somewhat flamish anyway).

At the very least, it would have been nice to get a "Shut up Tara, no one cares so we are moving this to the Dead Zone", so I would know who at the very least moved it.

Ive replied to you personally Tara, so hopefully that will clear things up

Indeed you have, thank you.

This complaint can be deleted now.

i didn't know where else to post so i'll take a shot at it here. if this isn't the right section than pardon me and please redirect this. anyway, here goes.

it's not so much as a complaint to a certain forum mod, the thing here is i just want a bit of justice.

you see, i was issued a board warning for "flame" for jestingly calling one player the boyfriend of the other. exact post went something like :
viewtopic.php?f=11&p=157432#p157432 <---this was the original post


and maybe, to some extent, one could call this as instigation, don't know about flame though, but either way, let's say i was wrong.

but if language was what gave me this board warning, i'd like any of the following mods to take a look at this:

corrupt-a-wish-t18650-420.html

and check constantine black's post down there

i was warned for using the term boyfriend but he slips away with "that term in the last sentence"?

my post was editted while his remains? oh c'mon. hoping to hear on this.

My fault. I have dealt with said post, as I should have when it was priorly mentioned to me.

thank you for dealing with it. it was a wait but i understand there are more things to do than this. i appreciate the action

Hello, I received a message from HIDA KOZAN saying that I received a warning for this ..





All I ask, how is this even close to rule breaking?