Wrestlling

Broadcast Phenomeon on WWE

Back to home

Raw:

Raw has been the lead brand and in my opinion always will. The reason why is because WWE Raw is live and not taped unlike Smackdown and ECW. So here we go from here!


-Heavyweight Division-

The Heavyweight Division features the most fierce and extreme stars in the business. You have Randy Orton, John Cena, Triple H, Ken Kennedy, Umaga, Jeff Hardy, JBL etc... Randy Orton recently got sidelined with a broken left collar bone after a botched RKO out of the ring attempt which saw Triple H push Orton over the ropes but Orton's right foot caught the rope and he tripped and landed awkwardly onto his left collar bone... Triple H proceeded to finish off Orton despite not caring that he just injured the best heel in the biz. So now WWE has HHH with the WWE Title. HHH ever since winning it has barely done anything, sure he only beat the crap out of ECW Stars, but then he got RKO'ed. He's barely had matches, appearances etc... since winning it at Backlash. WWE is going to fall due to Triple H's reign. I can tell you I'm not going to be watching WWE in a while.


-Women's Division-

The Women of WWE in my eyes are just beauty and no show. WWE wants beautiful people as women wrestlers to have fans attract their eyes on TV to watch them. The Divas of WWE cannot hold a candle to Knockouts, thus let alone be called divas. They are horrible at scripting their matches. Sure on occasion you see a good "Women's Fight" but most of the time its dull.


-Smackdown-

Smackdown is a boring show, the only reason is that it is taped and not live. Smackdown if they ever want to be close to Raw in ratings wise needs to hold live episodes of Smackdown.

-The Heavyweight Division-

The Heavyweights include, Edge, Batista, Khali, Big Show, Kane, CM Punk etc...

Smackdown GM Vicky Guerrero makes the show 10 times worse to watch with her and Edge all goo goo gaga over eachother, slobbering and making out every 10 seconds. So far the Undertaker's career is on the shelf due to a storyline that prohibited Taker from appearing on WWE because of him losing to Edge at ONS. Thus we won't see Taker for a few months. The entire Ric Flair saga has made its way from Raw to Smackdown in a war between HBK and Batista. Its a fairly boring subject on the being that the two are fighting over someone who has finally retired and left the business after 30 + years. Smackdown has no click to it at all and the matches are dull. There is no Women's Division and there is no more cruiserweight division. Just Valets, Managers and Wrestlers.



-ECW-

I barely watch ECW because it is also so very boring. The Roster is a mix of exotic dancers, boogeymen, freaks, and idiots. And if you watch it you do see more athleticism in the ECW ring then RAW, SD. But ECW won't catch many fans eyes because the spirit of it has died, Ever since ECW came back, its been The New Breed, The New Breed of ECW killed any life "THE OLD" ECW ever had, and that is why it has lost so many viewers.

ECW=No Talent, No Brains, and No Fans in my eyes.


 -End thoughts-

Mark on me if you want, but I'm speaking my mind, WWE is a failure and has continued to fall down the ranks of me ever watching it again. 


Views: 1,749 Wrestling Game

COMMENTS

Comment # 1

Comment # 36

Who remembers the Harris-Storm blindfold-cage-match? Whoever booked that needs shooting.

Posted by Cirice on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Man i think that was one stupid match... you need to hang publicly that idiot... :D

Posted by Archo on Thursday, June 12, 2008


Comment # 2

yo some people care about WWE it has some of the best superstars. the only reason u think its a failure is because you suck.

Posted by hey watch your mouth on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 3

What's the point of writing an article just complaining. At least say what you think they should do differently, or comment on trends that should change.

All you've managed to do here is point out some recent events and then say "it's boring" or "so I won't watch it." There's little real substance to this piece. Just as you have the right to speak your mind, I have the right to say that your mind didn't say much.

Posted by GT Wise on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 4

your a frekin idiot dude if you dont wwe kicks so much ass that it can cause blindness

Posted by Shawn on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 5

You need to send vickey guerrero back to mexico.Quit acting like she needs a wheel chair.and she needs to stop enterfier with everybodys matches when it comes with her baby edge.

Posted by lynn girvin on Saturday, June 21, 2008


Comment # 6

The comment "if u hate it so much then stop watching" sums it up perfectly.
For example,I can't stand TNA,so I don't watch it.
That's my right,but I don't come here just to rubbish it.

Posted by Mr Wrestling on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 7

True. WWE is so boring, unrealistic and fat. Only good thing is that WWE gives money to people.

Posted by Mike on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 8

unlike the others i like your article its briliant in my opinion.Now lets clarifi some things
for com1 the starts dont suck youre right(excepting hhh,khali,henry etc)but he doesnt suck as i said i think hes right if you didnt understand what he said then youre a......(sorry for this but that was a Very Stupid com)
for com 2:nothing to say but as i said i really like this artcle
for com3 you talked about yourself
and for com 4:your damn wrong.That was the old hhh the actual hhh would return to the ring,quicly let himself finished and then pinned.Orton was the best wrestler on raw as a matter of fact


Posted by grey on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 9

MORE DIVAS PLZ DIVAS!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by jason on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 10

Damn!!! You really need to get a life. WWE has been around for generations and you think it sucks. They have the best of the best on their shows and while mistakes are made, it is still exciting to watch. You definitely haven't watched WWE in a while because most of the divas like Mickie and Phoenix can beat the crap out of the TNA knockouts any day.

Posted by The Renegation on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 11

about coment 8 lol
about coment 9 Phoenix vs kong it would be funny or Phoenix vs any other knockout=Phoenix dead.WWE has been around for generation but the key word it has been not will be if we just dont wacht it and watch a true show like tna

Posted by grey on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 12

of course wwe became crap, it has like 30 years on this bussiness, they can no longer write good historys, and the new talent cant even get a 10 min match

Posted by manuel taker on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 13

Haha, TNA zealots make me laugh. It reminds me of ol' Dubya C Dubya, same people in charge, same people in commentary, same old wrestlers...only they use a smaller 6-sided ring. Who cares? Obviously no-one who matters because the 2-hour show struggles to pull 1.0 rating and they can't sell a PPV outside of Florida (and even then they have to give tickets away).

Posted by Cirice on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 14

... HHH ended the match once he saw that Orton was hurt. Do you think he would go "Oh no! Sorry Randy, I'm so sorry!".

Posted by X2X on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 15

about comment 13 yes :D :)).Abot comment 12 the quality of the matches matter too as a matter of fact

Posted by grey on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 16

For Argument 1: "Raw is the best WWE Show, because Raw is live" - What kind of argument is that? It doesn't even tell you a bit about a show if its live or not. A live show can be crappy as hell and a taped show can be the greatest one ever.

Secondly: For HHH not caring about Orton's health:
Yes, you definetly seem to be a mark. HHH did care about Orton, that's why we've seen this improvised finish with the sledgie. He wanted to give this match a fast, but decent ending, like it's usual in the Wrestling business. Undertaker would have done the same, HBK would, Cena would, heck every decent wrestler does it, this is how it works! You can't just scream "OUCHIE! OUCHIE! I'm hurt, stop the mach right now", "Ohhhh lil' Randy, we'll get your poopoo on a strecher right now, the Match doesn't matter...."
You have to see it from a business perspective.

Thirdly: For HHH seemingly not doin' any appearences since becoming WWE Champion:
Now I definetly think that you don't even watch WWE at all, you didn't see him confront Orton before ONS, right? You didn't see HHH manhandling Orton in the interrupted re-match after Backlash, right? You didn't see HHH hammering Orton away in a tag match with Cena, right? You didn't damn see the steel cage match on Judgement Day either, right???

The only thing you said, in the -RAW- section of this "article", was: HHH sucks, therefore WWE sucks, i won't watch it..... You didn't bring up one single correct fact to support your oppinion, it's just plain stupid.

Fourthly:
You've never seen Beth Phoenix, or Melina or Mickie James right?

Fifthly:
"Smackdown is a boring show, only because it's taped."
What does that have to do with SD! beeing great or boring at all? It's like i would say:"You suck because you said HHH sucks." - right away NONSENSE.

Argument 6:
Again, you just say: Vicky sucks (For the records, she doesn't. Did you notice that Heat that she can draw? Good for business), Batista vs. HBK sucks (For the records, it doesn't... this feud was so unforeseeable, my candidate for best feud of the year.), and Smackdown in general sucks, because no cruiserweight & Women's Division (which is wrong, just for the record.).
So therefore, you are again, talking about nothin' and just trashtalkin' WWE eventhough half of the things you say are wrong and can all be proven diffent if you just bring up a single fact! Smackdown! doesn't suck, for solid Midcard and Tag Team Wrestling it's show No.1 and the also started building a Women's Division there too, by drafting Victoria there and sending Natalya to SD!. Sorry, but you are, again, talking nonsense.

Seventh: ECW. The only right thing you said is that the "old" ECW is gone, but you misunderstood somethin'. Vinnie Mac' never intented on re-establishing the old-ECW.
Sure, it's WWE C-Show, what do you expect? A second Monday Night Raw? Certainly not. ECW is a good starting point for young talent like Kofi Kingston and also the place for some talent they don't show in the A- or B-Show, but who are able to deliver an relatively interesting Match, like Mike Knox, Stevie Richards or the team of Miz & Morrison.
ECW is not the best show, but definetly does not suck.

And for ECW=No talent, No brains and No Fans:

CM Punk, Matt Sydal, Miz, Morrison, Dreamer, Big Show, Kane, Kingston and SHELTON BENJAMIN!
I swear, NO talent AT ALL!

-Kingston vs. Benjamin = great classic feud
-T.Lo = great on-air authority

I swear, NO brains AT ALL

And certainly, NO FANS? alright, may all Fans of the WWEECW lift their Fingers. *Lifts Finger* Well thats allready one, so, No Fans? WRONG AGAIN.


Sry, but this "Article" contains nothin' but your seemingly unqualified oppinion and no facts or proof for it at all!

Posted by Sven "The Owner" on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 17

GO TNA!!!

Posted by joemama on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 18

The comment "if u hate it so much then stop watching" sums it up perfectly.
For example,I can't stand TNA,so I don't watch it.
That's my right,but I don't come here just to rubbish it.
can sum 1 grey with me


Posted by hughes on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 19

raw isnt live. none of them are live. You can go to the shows but if u havwe before you go to raw shows on friday because thats when they tape it.

Posted by guy on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 20

i think the best show were in WCW... Now i watch TNA and sometimes WWE... I think TNA Knockouts WILL beat a crap out of Divas... For example Awesome Kong or ODB or even Gail Kim... TNA now is like WWF and WWE is like WCW... WWE is SLOWLY dying while TNA is growing... i will not be surprise if in 2 or 3 years TNA will be bigger then WWE...

Posted by Archo on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 21

This is not even worth commenting on. Very TNA-biased.

Posted by The Glide on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 22

I like monkeys.


Posted by fatzo on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 23

haha, you must be funny, TNA winning the WWE? i hope u better change your point of view. TNA is just a bunch of wrestlers which WWE doesn't want, therefore they are not up to the standard of WWE.

Posted by Triple H on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 24

I agree with u Smackdown is falling apart. Ecw is one hour i mean i do like Kelly Kelly but Ecw......naaa The Whole Wwe has fallen apart since like 2004 they took a lot of titles away,Sucky Managers and No hardcore matches!!!

Posted by Jason Curran on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 25

now this is weird talking about the divas and comparing them to the knockouts = no comparison needed really but heres some facts tna thinks there division is the best, wwe dont promote it as much so obvisly they dont care, but lets break it down i could if i had an aritcle to do it in.

Posted by crazydude on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 26

I say TNA has a really good chance of staying head to head with WWE. There are a lot of reason to support this too. First major reason is that whatever WWE doesn't want TNA gets. HUGE MISTAKE getting rid of Kurt Angle!! He's probably the best wrestler the entire industry has to offer. Keep in mind that this is the same guy who, right before leaving to ECW from Smackdown, had one of the greatest matches ever with the Undertaker, and beat him cleanly. You can say it doesn't matter if you beat the Undertaker... oh but it does. Winning Matches = Popularity. He also has the natural talent that not many others have ever possessed.

Now let's talk about Knockouts vs. Divas. I watch RAW more than I do TNA for the record. I've seen Awesome Kong wrestle once, maybe twice. In my opinion from those 2 matches she is absolutely dominant. Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't O.D.B. and Gail Kim align together so they could topple a Knockout they couldn't manage to take out alone?? Now put Kong up against Beth Phoenix and/or Mickie James. Combined those 2 could bar Kong, but they would get owned alone.

Now the X division. You have the X division vs. the cruiserwe... oh wait that's right no more cruiser weight division. Enough said there.

WWE may have all the big names ike HHH, HBK, Edge, Taker, etc., but the little things are what matter. Vince is trying to give us new stuff that no one can possibly ever pull off. TNA is giving us a somewhat new look with the 6 sided ring and a few match types, but hey that's what WWE pretty much did during the legendary Attitude Era. That's now what TNA is doing, and if they can get a few more big names, maybe like Jeff Hardy again (this time with a title reign), or even some names just to spice up the locker room. Maybe someone like, I don't know, Kennedy or Jericho.

In conclusion, instead of this guy insulting all that is wrestling entertainment, maybe he should have wrote things like I have. Now I'm clearly not a professional analyst or anything, but whoever gave this guy his job should have this guy banned from any other reports, and then the guy who gave him the job should resign.

Posted by The Ripper on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 27

dude, if you watched Smackdown ou would now that they have made a Diva Championship belt. The first match for it is probably gonna happen at Night Of Champions.

ECW has gotten better in the last few months. Kane is the champ. miz and Morrison has smackdowns tag-team title. Teddy is the new GM of the show. Not to mention Shelton and Kolof Kingston are on it and have a pretty good rivalry going on.

Posted by NightHawk on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 28

This article was nothing but complaining, he offered no real thought to what he was writing. Nothing brilliant about this article.

Most of my friends have quit watching WWE, and I don't watch it as much as I used to. If you find it too boring to watch, great, but this article was just a pointless complaint.

Posted by GT Wise on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 29

just to clarify grey, my comments about hhh were sarcasm laced. i know hhh would put forth the effort to end a match with reasonable believabilty after an injury. i said what i said as a point to this chump mark that just cause someone is hurt u cant just stop the match, unless it is a serious life threatening injury. to the beth phoenix vs. kong comment, i dont know about beth beating the crap outta kong but it would be nice to see. on average i do believe that tna has better womens talent than wwe. they have gail, roxxi,kong, mickie knuckles,jacqulene,miss brooks, who are all solid workers. while right now all wwe has is mickie james, melina, victoria and beth.


Posted by Outlaw Damien Rouge on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 30

i used to like WWE but then i found UFC and havnt watched WWE since. and i think its funny when people on here tak about how some wrestler could beat up a different wrestler. thats like saying how tom cruise could beat up some other actor. i mean i know there athletes but its stupid to talk about wrestlers as if they were fighters. except for the few who could make it as fighters(kurt angle, shelton benjamin ect)

Posted by $moneymike$ on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 31

TNA has the only talent in wrestling now. I would rather watch Lucha Libre instead of Smack Down or ECW. Raw and TNA is the only good wrestling.

Posted by Jake Temple on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 32

Gawd, you piss me off. Makes me want to have an articolist job so I can one-up you. Which doesn't look too hard, btw.

Arguements:
HHH did care

If HHH didn't care, he would have made the match last another ten minutes and worked Randy's collarbone. Instead, he busted out a sledgehammer and then just wailed him in the head to give the fans a good ending and to not injure her further.

Arguement 2:
On HHH not making any appearences

Yes he has. See one of those ccmments up above me for a list.

Argument 3:
On Women's Division

You have obviously not seen Phoneix. Phoneix would kick Kong's if they fought, plus Melina has picked up the agression. Katie Lea, I haven't really seen her much, but in what I have seen her in, she's been good. On Smackdown, you have Natalya, Michelle McCool, and Victoria.

Argument 4:
Smackdown is awesome taped, because when I go to work and see the other WWE fans, I can make bets with them on what happened when I go to a show. Plus they have awesome dark matches scheduled to get people to go. Like, they just released tickets to Philly three days ago, and the main event dark match is Edge vs. Rey Mysterio. Should be great. Plus when they tape Smackdown, they also put the ECW live and on TV. Just truly awesome.

I'll excuse the fact that you didn't have anything about the new Smackdown's Women Divison.

Argument 5:
Where do you see a valet?

Honestly, where do you see a valet? There is none anymore.

Arugment 6:
Batista vs. HBK

Did you not see the fire Batista had in his eyes during the rivalry? Really? Didn't that make the feud awesome?

Arguement 7:
People who don't classify into your groups:

Colin Delaney, Tommy Dreamer, Chavo Guerrero, Bam Nealy, CM Punk, John Morrison, Miz, Mike Knox, Kofi Kingston, Matt Sydal

That's 12 people, and they only have like 17 on their show.

Final arguement:
the ECW comment

You sir, do not watch ECW, clearly.

Posted by The Philadelphia Phighter on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 33

About comment 22 just look at AJ Styles he is quite possibly the best athlete i've ever seen just go and watch some of the things he's done.

Posted by Guslightning on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 34

you said "ECW=No Talent"

Are you havin a laff?

What do you call CM Punk, Shelton Benjamin, Kofi Kingston, Evan Bourne, Chanvo Guerrerro, John Morrison etc??

And you said edge and vickie make out every 10 seconds and that vickie makes the show bad? MORE fans are actually watching the show now just to see vickie get ousted! and her nd edge have had 1 kiss in like 5 weeks, so dunno what show your watching really!!

Posted by Curtis Kash on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 35

Why are people making comments like "WWE divas will get the crap beaten out of them if they face Knockouts". This entire sport is scripted, if they tell Kong to job to Michelle McCool, you'll see Kong being beaten the crap out of her. And in real fights, wrestling talent matters very little I think.

Also it seems a little too negative to me. You watch it, so you must like SOMETHING about it, even the "ECW show full of idiots". And WWE seems to be doing quite allright by me. OK, they don't have that much TV competition, and I don't know their (sales) figures, but faillure seems to be a horrible way to describe their current state.

Posted by El Valo on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 36

yo wot u chattin about wwe has add legendary matches on sd such as taker vs batista morrison punk in my opinion u suck

Posted by jake fatal on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 37

Who remembers the Harris-Storm blindfold-cage-match? Whoever booked that needs shooting.

Posted by Cirice on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 38

Although I like watchin TNA... i thought this was his opinion on WWE! if u dont like it then write your own DAMN articles

Posted by F-X on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 39

I love Wwe divas TNA knokout are ugly like hell.Except The Beatiful people Gail Kim and ODB when you can se her panties.

Posted by Chokeslam on Tuesday, June 10, 2008


Comment # 40

tna is awsome


Posted by daniel roe on Wednesday, June 11, 2008


Comment # 41

ok seriously guys lay off him as he did an article and he did what he felt his opinion was so dont insult him over his article as that is his opinion and not yours so please just leave him alone.

Posted by webejus on Wednesday, June 11, 2008


Comment # 42

i think the artical sucks. and i watch all the wrestling i can find on tv different places have different stuff and i think it's cool.way i see it the more feds who make it big and get tv time the more choices we have to watch and such

Posted by xweaselxx on Wednesday, June 11, 2008


Comment # 43

well since this article suddenly became about WWE vs TNA

as off this moment WWE is better they have better story lines and better buisness sence
yeah TNA got some impressive guys but their storylines aint to good and their Gimmics come on I used to watch TNA just to watch AJ and Daniels team up and now he's CURRY MAN it sounds like an apetizer for kanibals

and now moving on to the WWE story lines theres one I would Like to talk about the Edge and Vickie storyline. I have heard alot of complaints about and how it makes them mad and its not a good storyline. well NEWS FLASH people storylines arent ment to make you happy their main purpose is to create a reaction from the fans(that would be you) so actualy its one of the best storylines WWE has had in a LONG time.

and one more thing people say vickie shouldent be on TV well your wrong I have often said that Edge is the best Heel on smackdown if not the entire WWE but now I realice that I'm wrong. for those of you that can watch judgment day listen to the heat she gets when she rolls out after the Taker vs Edge match the last time there was a crowd reaction like that WWE was called WWF.

Posted by ALFA on Wednesday, June 11, 2008


Comment # 44

Raw:

Raw has been the lead brand and in my opinion always will. The reason why is because WWE Raw is live and not taped unlike Smackdown and ECW. So here we go from here!



-Heavyweight Division-

The Heavyweight Division features the most fierce and extreme stars in the business. You have Randy Orton, John Cena, Triple H, Ken Kennedy, Umaga, Jeff Hardy, JBL etc... Randy Orton recently got sidelined with a broken left collar bone after a botched RKO out of the ring attempt which saw Triple H push Orton over the ropes but Orton's right foot caught the rope and he tripped and landed awkwardly onto his left collar bone... Triple H proceeded to finish off Orton despite not caring that he just injured the best heel in the biz. So now WWE has HHH with the WWE Title. HHH ever since winning it has barely done anything, sure he only beat the crap out of ECW Stars, but then he got RKO'ed. He's barely had matches, appearances etc... since winning it at Backlash. WWE is going to fall due to Triple H's reign. I can tell you I'm not going to be watching WWE in a while. Ok. the heavyweight division is a joke. it only triple h, john cena and jeff hardy. who is feud with jbl? no one! its the same with Umaga. mr. kennedy is having a good feud with paul burchill. but its not going to be on ppvs. so its meaningless right now. the heavyweight division on raw needs a change. too many people who be there before.



-Women's Division-

The Women of WWE in my eyes are just beauty and no show. WWE wants beautiful people as women wrestlers to have fans attract their eyes on TV to watch them. The Divas of WWE cannot hold a candle to Knockouts, thus let alone be called divas. They are horrible at scripting their matches. Sure on occasion you see a good "Women's Fight" but most of the time its dull. push the title is meaningless. the storyline with mickie james/john cena got drop. no reason why? plus it make mickie and john look stupid. john cena does nothing with mickie james? im sorry but i think mickie james is hot and i would try anything to get in to her panties. the main story with the women is beth phoneix and melina. why? the title is on mickie james. it makes mickie james meaningless



-Smackdown-

Smackdown is a boring show, the only reason is that it is taped and not live. Smackdown if they ever want to be close to Raw in ratings wise needs to hold live episodes of Smackdown. dont know if taping the show hurts. but i think the show is hurt with the fact it is center on one person all the time.
-The Heavyweight Division-

The Heavyweights include, Edge, Batista, Khali, Big Show, Kane, CM Punk etc...
sorry to say this but smackdown heavyweight division is edge, batista and undertaker that it. big show is on ecw. same with kane and cm punk. where is the future smackdown star?
Smackdown GM Vicky Guerrero makes the show 10 times worse to watch with her and Edge all goo goo gaga over eachother, slobbering and making out every 10 seconds. So far the Undertaker's career is on the shelf due to a storyline that prohibited Taker from appearing on WWE because of him losing to Edge at ONS. Thus we won't see Taker for a few months. The entire Ric Flair saga has made its way from Raw to Smackdown in a war between HBK and Batista. Its a fairly boring subject on the being that the two are fighting over someone who has finally retired and left the business after 30 + years. Smackdown has no click to it at all and the matches are dull. There is no Women's Division and there is no more cruiserweight division. Just Valets, Managers and Wrestlers. totally agrue with u about the cruiseweight division. it got destroy by hornswaggle. he won the title then had to drop it and its never return. great way for the wwe to respect its titles.




-ECW-

I barely watch ECW because it is also so very boring. The Roster is a mix of exotic dancers, boogeymen, freaks, and idiots. And if you watch it you do see more athleticism in the ECW ring then RAW, SD. But ECW won't catch many fans eyes because the spirit of it has died, Ever since ECW came back, its been The New Breed, The New Breed of ECW killed any life "THE OLD" ECW ever had, and that is why it has lost so many viewers.

ECW=No Talent, No Brains, and No Fans in my eyes.



-End thoughts-

Mark on me if you want, but I'm speaking my mind, WWE is a failure and has continued to fall down the ranks of me ever watching it again.



Posted by jonathan garza on Wednesday, June 11, 2008


Comment # 45

Ecw have Shelton,Morrison,Chavo,Punk,Kofi etc etc

Hows dat for frickin talent!!

Posted by Curtis Kash on Wednesday, June 11, 2008


Comment # 46

Everyone that has been hating PLEASE REFER TO COMMENT 37 AND MAYBE it will give most you Marks/HATERS a brain to do something.

Posted by Cody on Thursday, June 12, 2008


Comment # 47

Well my brain tells me that i am no mark and i know that match. It was at last years TNA Lockdown (2007). And let me tell you somethin': This match was horrible. So happy birthday, read my Comment (#16) again and you'll see that not me, but the guy who "wrote" this "article" seems to be a mark.

Posted by Sven on Thursday, June 12, 2008


Comment # 48

I am the guy who wrote the article, get a life, Its a shot at WWE if you don't like it then leave.

Posted by Sven on Thursday, June 12, 2008


Comment # 49

yo Mr. Comment 48, stop copying my name, you aren't Sven, you are more likekly Cody or Grey, who are weirdly adoring this "Article". The Real Sven did neither write the article or like the Artikle. The Real one wrote his oppinion in the long comment No.16

And BTW, thx for noticeing that this is no reliable, correct article, but a more likely a stupid mark-shot at WWE by a man who seems to have no idea about wrestling and i can't understand why someone like this could be allowed to write an article. For writing an article you have to be impartial, but the writer is just a blindet TNA Zealot.

Oh and i forgot to talk about your last statement saying that WWE was a failure and will fall:
This is the most stupid thing i have ever heard. WWE is not a failure, it's a multi-billion dollar company and the only thing WWE is doing is growing.

Posted by "The Real Sven"; Sven "The Owner" on Friday, June 13, 2008


Comment # 50

shut up ric flair is awesome and just because it its taped not live dosent mean it sucks

Posted by taker fan on Friday, June 13, 2008


Comment # 51

And by the Way Cody, if taped shows would suck, then TNA Impact would be the worst show in the history of television, because it is taped for at least a week ahead and every few weeks it is taped for multiple weeks ahead!

So don't even think that TNA gets any close to WWE.

Posted by "The Real Sven"; Sven "The Owner" on Friday, June 13, 2008


Comment # 52

i disagree with a few of you. I agree that raw is better than smackdown, but only because they have the veteran wrestlers and they place a lot of recruits on smackdown. But even smackdowns better than ecw. I watch smackdown and although its taped it is still good. and to keep the ratings really close to raw, they put olny a few but some of the best wrestlers on smackdown.

Posted by max trapasso on Saturday, June 14, 2008


Comment # 53

ONLY TEDDY LONG CAN SAVE ECW

Posted by NICK HOGAN on Saturday, June 14, 2008


Comment # 54

ECW IS HARDCORE AND IS AWESOME AND IF U SAY THAT UR A FAG CUZ ECW MADE HARDCORE AND THE LEGEND OF ECW WILL ALWAYS LIVE AND I KINDA AGREE WITH U SAYIN RAWS BETTER BUT SERIOUSLY I DONT GO AROUND SAYIN T EVERYWHERE CMON BROTHER GE A LIFE

Posted by john cena rulz on Sunday, June 15, 2008


Comment # 55

Cena rulz ECW is not extreme. ECW needs to stand for Extremly Crudy Wrestling


Posted by Jake Temple on Sunday, June 15, 2008


Comment # 56

You're completely wrong about Triple H's reaction to Orton getting hurt. That's not my opinion that's fact. I know becuase I saw it. All Triple H did after that was punch him then nail him with the sledgy. Besided what did you want him to do just stop the match. Orton wouldn't have stopped the match for Hunter. These guys know the risks. Orton wouldn't have wanted the match to just be stopped.

Posted by The White Ranger on Sunday, June 15, 2008


Comment # 57

Yo John Cena rulz get out of here with that crap... ECW is lame and low life.
I agree with Jake Temple.
Sven Idk who the hell that is on comment 48...

Posted by Cody on Sunday, June 15, 2008


Comment # 58

Commenting on 12 actualy yea new talent does get 10 min matches John beat JBL or Kennedy forgot which but it took 10:02

Posted by Austin on Monday, June 16, 2008


Comment # 59

I find this kind of thing funny: "TNA rules, WWE sucks!" "What a complete fanboy. WWE rules, TNA sucks!" "When will these idiots stop being totally biased? TNA rules, WWE sucks!" "Who let the marks in? WWE rules, TNA sucks!"... and so on...

Here's a thought: If you're having a go at somebody for being a mark or a fanboy or whatever, it's slightly (just slightly) spoiled if you then go on to say that obviously (obviously!) the other company suck. Bit of common sense wouldn't go amiss.

Posted by Jane Ross on Tuesday, June 17, 2008


Comment # 60

I like smackdown and think raw is a lost cause but you're right about ecw

Posted by Riley on Friday, June 20, 2008


Comment # 61

Very Good,but i want to play the Game

Posted by Jenyo on Saturday, June 21, 2008


Comment # 62

i love the undertaker i love wwe the only thing i hate is the stupid la famailia vickie is fat she couldent walk thats y she needs a wheel chair and edge is a cheater not a master a cheater and hawkins is a tuant he tuants on hawk and ryder is in sanandreas GTA ryder and chavo hes a coward lier and neely is on my nail he always need to be a manager becuase hes a coward too hes a maid hes bald like a boxing glove the undertaker and kane the brothers of destruction rules they are the dominant tag team ever to be on the wwe ring edge vickie chavo neely hawkins ryder sukkers u suck undertaker and kane brothers of destruction rockers they rock

Posted by undertakerey on Monday, June 23, 2008


Comment # 63

I rather watch reruns of king of the hill than smackdown raw is the best show triple h is now on smackdown batista on raw and so is rey mystiro raw is the flag ship of the wwe tna whats that? ovw has better wrestlers than tna

Posted by NICK HOGAN on Tuesday, June 24, 2008


WRITE YOUR COMMENT
Your name:
Comments:
Verification code:
Code Image - Please contact webmaster if you have problems seeing this image code
Load a new image
Warning, please copy the letters respecting the caps locks as the image is showing.