Bonjour everyone. This is hopefully the first in a very long list of articles that I’ll write on lots of different wrestling related topics. When I was told to write this article a long list of topics came in to my head, things such as articles on: who I thought was the greatest wrestler of all time, who I believe is the best performer in the ring and what I believe are the most overrated finishers in professional wrestling but then I thought "how about writing an article telling people why I believe Total Non stop Action wrestling is the best professional wrestling federation in the world that I know of which is exactly what I’m going to do, prepare to be ranted at. The first reason that brings me round to this way of thinking is the way that "The King Of The Mountain" Jeff Jarrett started TNA from the ground up. I am one of those guys that believe that something earned is a lot more satisfying then something just given to you, fair enough that Vince McMahon of WWE has turned his company into a global franchise but he didn’t found it, originally his father made the company and then passed it down, I applaud Double J on his hard work as I believe he has made a top class company out of nothing, the story truly is inspiring. The next reason I think that TNA totally owns WWE on and that is matches, yeah WWE has had some great matches like the elimination chamber and the ‘cell’ (PG rating going way too far) but I don't believe that those matches are even in the same league as the "Feast or Fired", "Lethal Lockdown", "Ultimate Sacrifice", "King Of The Mountain" or even the "Ultimate X" Matches. Now for a breakdown of each match don't you think? Feast or Fired; Some people have said that this match is pretty much a Money In The Bank Match that WWE puts on every year and in some ways I guess they would be right, both matches consist of the competitors aiming to collect a briefcase(s) that is suspended up above the ring but that is about it on similarities because the MITB match consists of only one briefcase with only one title shot that goes along with it oh and it has 6 competitors vying for the case, whereas FoF has 4 briefcases with 14 wrestlers. In my world the bigger the numbers the better the show, the idea of FOF is get hold of a briefcase which will entitle you to either a tag team title shot, an X division title shot, a heavyweight title shot or you could be unlucky and get the case which dictates that you must be fired for at least a year, and in the 2 years it has been done the same person has got that case and has been fired (Daniels and Curry man, if you didn't know they were the same person, shame on you), but with the number of talented guys in the match, it never disappoints. One memorable moment stands out for me and that’s when the guys of the Motor City Machine Guns were holding up one of the briefcases in victory (they hadn’t actually won the match yet as the rules state that your feet must touch the floor around the ring while holding the case for it to count, and they were in the ring) and out of nowhere "Black Machismo" Jay Lethal went springboard and stole the case straight from them, it was great acting from everyone involved and in the end that is all that matters. I think I’ll discuss those other matches in another article if I get the chance but anyways.... TO THE SKIES! Or… The next section, your choice. The second area in which I believe TNA far outranks the WWE is on the pure talent of their X Division, mainly because the WWE has no cruiserweight division to speak of (BOO!), but also because the guys in that division are insanely talented, examples I hear you cry? What about Alex Shelley? Chris Sabin? Jay Lethal (youngest guy on the roster)? Consequences Creed? Daniels? Sheik Abdul Bashir? Eric Young? And finally "The Phenomenal" AJ Styles. I think I made my point, but if that isn't enough for you, then let us just remember some memorable moments from the X Divisions’ History, The Match To Crown. The first ever X Division champion has to be there because without it we wouldn't have all these guys now, this match was under double elimination rules (which I thought was awesome!) and had Psicosis, Jerry Lynn, Low Ki and AJ Styles with AJ eventually coming out on top, it seriously was one match that I will never forget, and secondly the steel asylum match which consisted of a lot of guys in a roofed cage trying to climb through a hole in the roof, I will never forget how I felt when I saw all of the guys get taken out by some huge massive spot in the form of a big power bomb suplex hurricanrana thing as the French would say "c'etait super". That means "it was great" for all your non French speakers Staying on the division’s subject, where is WWE's tag division? It used to be awesome back in the day but now has withered away to nothing, What ever happened to the likes of the Hardy Boyz? The Dudley Boys? Edge and Christian? I remember watching those TLC matches with awe, and now you never see anything like it in WWE but you do in TNA. I mean not even a month ago, Team 3D had their open invitational tag tournament which consisted of the Motor City Machine Guns, Lethal Consequences, The British Invasion and Beer Money plus others in it, and as 3D always say "tag team wrestling is alive and well in TNA" and they're right, one of the reasons I tune into TNA every week is to see the tag teams do what they do best and that is wrestle. TNA also has 2 sets of IWGP tag champs in the form of team 3D (heavyweight) and the MCMG (junior) If you hadn't already guessed the MCMG are my favourite tag team probably of all time and both members are accomplished singles wrestlers on the Indy circuit so you know they are good. That is another thing TNA seems to do really well and that is scout talent, most of the guys on the roster are accomplished wrestlers and so if they are accomplished they must be semi good. I know all the non believers will be thinking "but TNA steals the rejects from WWE" and in a way that is true, a lot of guys do end up in TNA from WWE but that is because WWE doesn't know its own talent, I mean what company gets rid of MRRRRRR KENNNNNNNEDYYYYY????! (have any of you read the blog he wrote about his job being accident prone? God, he is a great man) I mean seriously, they have been doing for years and I'm crazy? Just look at Christian, he was hated in WWE so he left and went to TNA where he was a champion then WWE took him back when they realised they were stupid for releasing him in the first place, same for R truth, he has been fired and rehired so many times he is like a yoyo, the fans loved him in TNA (where he was champ) and love him now (where he isn't even in a title picture), it just makes no sense to me. Onto the women's division (I know, I skipped the divisions subject a bit but ah well.) Where can you go to see Awesome Kong beating the poor girls of The Beautiful People in stretcher matches? (As well Cute Kip!) Or to watch Tara to also beat on the same poor girls (well a few weeks ago you could have said WWE but not any more so HA). I’m sure Victoria left there 1) Because Vince is a *'; or 2) Because there is no women’s talent in WWE well except for Gail Kim, but she is just awesome. If you really need more evidence then just look at Awesome Kong somersaulting off of the top rope (honestly 'tube it, 'tis hilarious). Onto the comedy value of the brand now, despite being a serious show the guys in creative still manage to make guys laugh, whether it is the many voices of Booker T (he is surprisingly talented with voices), the blunders of Scott Steiner (all the 'roids have gone to his head), another memorable Steiner moment was from the "Cactus Jack smack attack" match between Scotty and JJ where Steiner decided to play on a pogo stick mid match only to be clotheslined off of it, it was just a good bit of fun. Another thing that makes TNA, is the interviewers and the commentators, JB and Lauren have such good personalities and it shines through and then every week you hear some kind of rubbish come out of don west's mouth (mostly about the suicide "conspiracy" lately) but every week something he says makes me laugh and it really does make the difference, also the references to pop culture make it that much more fun (mostly it is about twitter, but its something I can enjoy and I‘m sure other teenagers would agree with me). Now I am not saying that I am completely anti-WWE, I just don't like the fact that one of their main events at a recent event was John Cena Vs Big Show, I mean seriously, both of those wrestlers can't wrestle not even for their lives, see I would watch WWE if they got in proper talent, got rid of all the dead weight and started pushing the superstars as superstars (cough cough Evan Bourne cough) and not just jobbers, also they need to sort out their PG rating, I’m pretty sure little kids will not understand that the violence is staged, so why does a little bit of fake blood or a teensy bit of woman skin make a difference?, They are taking it far. Too far. Well that was me ranting, feel free to comment below on anything I’ve said, or anything I could do to improve, or any ideas for future articles I am always looking to better myself so go for it. Keep it Rockin’!
Great i identify with ya mate i'm a teenager (Nearly-12-lol)the only thing i'd say is If WWE brought back the cruiserweight division they'd be back in contention (maybe) look at the likes of wrestler they could have in it: Rey Mysterio , Evan Bourne , Carlito, Kofi Kingston , John Morrison, Ricky Ortiz ,Jimmy Wang Yang , Jamie Noble , JTG(I suppose)Gregory Helms and if they brought in some talent from indy feds and FCW they'd have a Cruiserweight division to rival the X Division and WWE would be back on track again.
Thanks for listening to me ramble on.
One Thing. WOO ! FIRST !
Cheers as always,Jason Campbell.
Posted by Jason Campbell on Sunday, June 21, 2009
Or 2nd lol and PG Rating doesn't really do anything tbh
Posted by Jason Campbell on Sunday, June 21, 2009
I think you might have some points but I think overall, your article was too biased.. I think you hate the WWE for the wrong reasons. You don't look at it's good sides but rather find reasons to hate it... I think TNA has good talents and good matches but it's still have no match with the WWE. but that's just what I think...
Posted by John Jessie on Sunday, June 21, 2009
I think that WWE is the best wrestling federation right now. It has everything and they have their own ideas (well.. some of them)
TNA is always imitating WWE, searchs for former wwe wrestlers and only has gymnick matches...
WWE is going PG 'cause it's so big that it must be careful not to influence the young ones ("The World is watching")
Posted by Rafa on Sunday, June 21, 2009
Nice artical.... I agree with pretty much everything!
Posted by NBK on Sunday, June 21, 2009
I understand what you are saying john jessie about the way this article could be seen as bias, but then saying that, I'm writing these articles to represent my opinions on TNA, so of it will be a tad bias, I'm not totally against WWE. They just need to sort their act out i feel.
Posted by Astatine on Sunday, June 21, 2009
I get your point... I also think the WWE needs to improve on some areas but you must admit that it is currently doing things differently to try and be better than they already are... And I still think WWE is better than TNA but TNA is growing up quickly... So we'll just see what happens...
Posted by John Jessie on Sunday, June 21, 2009
Yeah, they are trying their best. Well as i said, if they sort it then I may start watching again
Posted by Astatine on Sunday, June 21, 2009
Oh. A special thanks needs to go out to Medos, cos otherwise this never would of happened, thanks dude
Posted by Astatine on Sunday, June 21, 2009
Ricky ortiz can't be a Cruiserweight, hes too heavy NOB :)
I agree with the article, I wish WWE would get rid of dead weights (The Miz, Big Show, Batista, John Cena, Mark Henry ect....), but don't forget TNA has dead weight aswell (Sting, Mick Foley, Kevin Nash, Brutus magnus & h8 2 say it 2 a Welshman btu Rob Terry)
they need tos rot their act out or leave.
Don't get me wrong Mick Foley & Sting were class back in the day btu theya re dragging hte company down, and is everyone else sick of seeing Triple H VS Randy Orton? :P
Posted by Huang Zhong on Sunday, June 21, 2009
Allo fellow article writer;
I believe that your article was, as aforementioned, a little biased. However, in the long haul, it's a very nice and well written article.
I fully hope to see some more from you in the future!
Posted by Cthulu on Sunday, June 21, 2009
I totally agree with you huang zhong, TNA does have dead weight, it's just a shame that most of the older wrestlers haven't got it anymore, as you said sting and mick foley can't wrestle anymore. I think the british invasion could be a good team if TNA gave them the right oppotunity
Posted by Astatine on Sunday, June 21, 2009
To be honest, the PG rating doesn't really make a difference at the core of the matter. What did we lose? Blood, swearing, and nudity? I tune in to WWE to watch wrestling. If I wanted those other things, well, I already have the internet for that. I don't need to watch a grey-haired Jeff Jarret give us his breed of "shock value" in the form of short skirts and bleeped promos.
Posted by Mikey Bubonik on Sunday, June 21, 2009
You have some okay points. If you're going to make any kind of argument, though, you're going to have to address TNA's weaknesses as well. You wisely avoided them because right now they're still big enough that TNA isn't ready to make a serious jump to competing with WWE.
1) Booking -- TNA's booking has gotten a little better over the last year, but the creative team still isn't doing much for me in terms of making me care about their storylines.
2) Show layout -- TNA does have the capability to have good matches with the talented roster they have. They instead run the Total Nonstop Talking show every week, have nonsensical segments with everyone shouting for a full minute, and in general barely beat out ECW in terms of total match time per show.
3) Loyalty. We saw it with Christian jumping last year. TNA lost one of their biggest stars because he wasn't happy with the direction they were going. We have a strong chance to see the same happen with Angle very soon. This happens to WWE as well, of course, but they're WWE and they can survive it a lot easier than TNA can.
4) Production -- WWE has the best production team out there. TNA's is still highly amateur-ish.
5) Focus -- it's all well and good that TNA has got young studs like the Guns, Joe, AJ, etc. But how often have any of them been treated like the focus of the company recently? A short, middling title run for Joe. A couple failed title challenges for Joe and AJ. That's it. Over the last year, the main event has CONSTANTLY revolved around four guys over 40 (JJ, Angle, Foley, and Sting), with NO young guys getting a consistent spotlight all year.
They're a fun alternative to WWE. I give them that. They have a roster of great talent. I give them that. But I do not think that they are anywhere near the best wrestling company out there. Impact is only the third best wrestling show on TV, and it will go back to fourth after whoever's responsible for RAW lately is fired or assassinated by a smark.
Posted by The Glide on Sunday, June 21, 2009
Glide I'm gonna hope that you are putting 'Superstars' in front of Raw, and not ECW.
Anyway, good first article. I agree 100% about the WWE's mistake of dumping the Cruiserweight Division. That was pretty much the 1st of the long list of issues that caused me to stop watching WWE.
And just a little help for comment 2- A lot of those guys could definitely not compete in the C-weight Division if they kept the old weight limit... Morrison, Ricky O, Carlito, Kofi(maybe though, not sure on his weight
Posted by Carter Wright on Monday, June 22, 2009
"John Cena Vs Big Show, I mean seriously, both of those wrestlers can't wrestle not even for their lives"
I'm quoting here. Let's get one thing straight here. One of them can't wrestle and that's Cena. If Big Show can't wrestle, he wouldn't be the youngest WCW champion in history, or beaten both Triple H and the Rock to win the WWE title for the first time. Trust me, the man can wrestle
Posted by The Renegation on Monday, June 22, 2009
Like Glide said, TNA storylines are simply bad, they dont have an even decent creative team.
Now for their ring performance, yes they are truly way but WAY better than wwe, i hav watched some of their matches and they truly can put an excelent show in ring, but i cant watch a full show of them, is boring, if you are looking for only wrestling with no background story this is the place.
Good article tho, even if i dont like the TNA
Posted by manuel taker on Monday, June 22, 2009
IF wwe amped the C-Department and tna had better storylines, it would be more of a contest.
Right now, wwe is just better
Posted by Mamoru on Monday, June 22, 2009
Superstars is a sideshow. It's a supplement to the other brands, not a functioning TV show in itself.
To clarify, the only four I'm really referring to are 1) Smackdown, 2) ECW, 3) Impact, 4) RAW. Superstars would be 5 if I was forced to rank it because it's got no story development. I'm not qualified to comment on ROH right now because it hasn't made my week-to-week viewing schedule.
My main point is that Impact is better than RAW at the moment, but a year ago that wasn't true, and it will change again in the coming months, and Impact drops back to #4.
Posted by The Glide on Monday, June 22, 2009
If you say you're going to review match types, you don't just go to a different tangent. You should have stuck with keeping match types and talked about cruisers and tag team wrestlers in another article
That being said... gimmick matches is not a good reason to rate one company over another.
Posted by October Raven on Monday, June 22, 2009
I know I shouldn't of tangented of on one like you said but ah well, shoot me. The reason i think the "gimmick" matches puts TNA above WWE is cos they are fun to watch, they serve no other purpose then to be awesome. As much as it pains me to say i do agree with Glide on some points, but when you love something enough you learn not to take any notice of it's faults =P. Aswell I probs shouldnt be so 1sided on this issue but it is just the way things are unfortunately.
Posted by Astatine on Monday, June 22, 2009
Well, the gimmick's matches are mostly used because the storyline is not good enought to attract the viewers, so if TNA has A LOT of them, I think it is more showing a weakness than taking advantage of the WWE.
Also, even when I hate to say it, I guess the WWE is first place not only because it does have storylines, but the publicity, also it goes worldwide, while TNA is not that accesible in other places.
Posted by DClaw on Monday, June 22, 2009
nice article i agree with most things but Big Show can wrestle its ust that anyone who wrestles cena looks bad because his storyline is supposed to be getting pummeled in a match and hit 1 move to win
Posted by Jordan Hardy on Monday, June 22, 2009
I kinda agree with The Glide on TNA's focus. I mean I don't want to see the same people over and over again in the main event (Foley,JJ,etc..) I think it's time to let the rest of the roster have its spotlight but that's just my opinion.
Posted by F-X on Monday, June 22, 2009
bloody hell Sam. get your rant out ;)
Posted by kembaaa on Monday, June 22, 2009
Boring. TNA sucks. So bad topic. I would of liked it if you choose what the most over rated finisher is. But then you would choose TNA finishers. WWE is the best out their. RAW and Smackdown anyways. TNA is on the level of ECW. ECW is 1 hour and is still pulling in higher ratings then TNA. Superstars is almost pulling in higher ratings then TNA.
Topic 2\10 Typing etc. 8/10
Posted by Jonathan Simpson on Tuesday, June 23, 2009
wow i totally now wat ur talking about
Posted by trishfan000 on Monday, June 22, 2009
Gimmick matches are a crutch. You can have a much better match with two talented workers just doing their thing.
Matches other than standard, one-fall bouts should be a rarity. Like, maybe, one a year tops.
Posted by OctoberRaven on Monday, June 22, 2009
How can you say that Big Show is a better wrestler than Cena? Let me play out one of Big Show's matches:punch, punch, headbutt, headbutt, heatbutt, body slam, chokeslam. And yeah, they are pretty much doing a Hulk Hogan thing with Cena but that isnt his fault, its the creative teams'.
Posted by PG rating is GAY! on Monday, June 22, 2009
Your opinion is as valid as anyone else's. I just think you're wrong. TNA isn't better than WWE. TNA is only better than [WW]ECW. And that's ONLY because WWE puts no real focus on it. They just leave it as a training-ground. [Which is lame]
TNA has so many huge problems, that they'll probably never be in a position to really compete with WWE. And that's too bad because I'd love an alternative to WWE. I am not biased at all. WWE sucks, these days.
However, TNA has NEVER shown me a good show! Not once. Sure, fans might say, that maybe their PPVs might be good. Well, I wouldn't know. I haven't even been able to ever sit through an entire episode of Impact without changing the channel. So, I certainly wouldn't order their PPVs. Their creative team is absolutely mindless. And they feel their audience is too. [And treat them accordingly] They're stuck in the "wrasslin" days. Just like WCW was. And we all saw how well that worked out for WCW.
Posted by "Mean" Mike Shaw on Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Mike Shaw: No offense, but you'd have to be trippin' on something to think that RAW is a better show over the last two months than ECW.
Posted by Glide on Tuesday, June 23, 2009
in defence of TNA, if people sit down to watch it then they will enjoy it, but it cant grip people who just plain dont want to be gripped, plus it does have higher ratings then ECW and the PPVs are amazing
Posted by Astatine on Wednesday, June 24, 2009
the only BIG problem with tna is that some rivalries dont make sense wwe has lot of problems reslesing stars *cough mr kennedy cough*
Posted by mangler joe on Wednesday, June 24, 2009
McMahon is 100 times the promoter Jarett is. JJ will never come close to achieving what McMahon has.
A gimmick match does not equal a great match. WWE is careful about when to use their gimmick matches. They protect them, so that when they do use one it actually means something and the fans have something to get excited about. How many times a year do you see a cage match in WWE? TNA has a whole bloody PPV of cage matches.
The statement 'TNA creative' is a contradiction. They come up with ridiculous gimmick matches, that can be extremely risky for the wrestlers involved, and poor storylines.
The X-division is great, I agree with you there. Or rather, it WAS great. These days, meh. I think the reason WWE canned the cruiserweights, and the same goes for the lack of tag-team wrestling, is simply because it doesn't draw. WWE is a company, its primary goal is to make money. To do this, it will give the people what they want to see.
You are incredibly deluded if you do not think Cena can wrestle. He is one of the most talented performers in the world at the moment, if not the finest. He was able to carry Khali and Lashley to matches that were miles better than they had any right to be. And, dare I say, he will have no trouble having a half-decent match with Miz at the upcoming PPV. The Big Show is a great wrestler also, and is one of the top big men in the world.
"a little bit of fake blood"
You do realise when a wrestler bleeds its, more often than not, real blood?
The PG rating doesn't faze me too much. Sure, I love seeing a chair shot as much as the next guy, but the rating hasn't had that big of an effect. We still see some blood (blood too often is ridiculous anyway), get weapon shots, and cage matches. Wrestling has always been popular primarily amongst kids, the PG rating is a sensible business move.
There is a reason that WWE, and not TNA, is the number one wrestling company in the USA, and the world. Its because its better.
Posted by Jack West on Wednesday, June 24, 2009
I agree that TNA is now better than WWE. In fact, I hadn't watched wrestling in about a year until one night I was flipping channels and saw the TNA listing again for the 50th time.
I always assumed the 'TNA' stood for something else besides 'Total Nonstop Action'. Know what I'm getting at? SO, I never bothered to watch.
But, when I saw JJ out there, I had to stop for a sec. I remember him from the days on USWA when him and Brian Christopher went at it all the time.
Anyway, There were enough old wrestlers on there for me to connect with, and plenty of new ones to watch as well. Samoa Joe is now my favorite wrestler, and I like the old ECW guys they've brought back.
And I agree with everything you said about the tags. And the cruiserweight division. SUICIDE has an awesome moveset. And the womens wrestling actually interests me on TNA, not just eye candy.
But the main reason, is Mick Foley. You just never know what to expect out of him, but it's always gonna be cool. I don't know much about the business end of things, but I really hope TNA stays around for awhile.
After all, look how bad WWE screwed up ECW.
Posted by Armilian on Wednesday, June 24, 2009
My favorite part of this entire page is the bit about "fake blood". That made me smile. Sure, it's fake. Whatever you have to tell yourself to sleep at night.
Two things. Mick Foley hasn't been REALLY compelling television since the end of his Mankind gimmick. Since then, we're all just nostalgic. And that helps pad his salary. But I don't care. I respect him as an entertainer. He's earned it.
And the other things is.. I miss The Rock, as a wrestler. Yeah. He was tops.
Posted by "Mean" Mike Shaw on Wednesday, June 24, 2009
I give ECW credit that they have improved since Swagger and Christian came around. But I still dont think they beat out Raw. Maybe my mind will change if ECW continues to rise and Raw continues with this current storyline.
I'm forced to turn my attention to "PG Rating is Gay!" up there in comment 30. If you think that Show's matches are like that, I'd like to hear your point of view on Cena's....But in case you don't know I'll give you a little nutshell synopsis...
Cena's opponent goes on the offensive early for about 3 minutes. Cena fights back, bounces off the ropes and hits a couple diving shoulders. He then hits a Blue Thunder Driver (don't know what he calls it but I know it as Blue Thunder). Next up is the most pointless move in his artillery...The 5 Knuckle Shuffle. He finishes it off with an F...errr...Attitude Adjustment AND maybe an STF if we're REALLLLY lucky.
Thats about it any questions?
Posted by Carter Wright on Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Carter Wright: Yes I know what Cena's matches are like, didn't I say that? They're doing a Hulk Hogan thing with him. His opponent goes on the offensive for a while, Cena/Hulk gets fired up, hits some big moves, and the opponent is finished off with his finisher.
Posted by PG Rating is Gay! on Thursday, June 25, 2009
Okay so you poked a hole in your own logic. How does that make him any better than Big Show? Their matches are similar aren't they? So they should be pretty much equal shouldn't they?
Posted by Carter Wright on Thursday, June 25, 2009
Carter: You can say that they are equal, which for the most part I agree with, but Cena has a wider variety of moves that he can use. But I do give Show credit, he is pulling out a submission move recently.
Posted by PG Rating is Gay! on Saturday, June 27, 2009
Maybe Cena has a bigger variety, but his matches still put me to sleep or have me reaching for a bucket.
Posted by Carter Wright on Saturday, June 27, 2009
Lets settle this once and for all, they both suck as wrestlers! fair enough?
Posted by Astatine on Sunday, June 28, 2009
I think that TNA would be able to really compete (possibly like WCW/WWE) if they could get a better creative team. Like the Main Event Mafia angle is decent in my opinion, but it is just like the NWO. Or like the Beer Money/Team 3D angle. It kinda reminds me of the respect angle between Edge and Christian and the Hardy Boyz back in the ealy 2000's. But they have some hope (like the Foley/JJ storyline;nothing's as fun as watching Mick beg and act like a crazy uncle). Either way both companies are entertaining to watch.
Posted by AJ Alejandro on Monday, June 29, 2009
I agree with Aj Alejandro kind of, i do like watching Foley but not watching him wrestle, he cant do it anymore, the match he had against Rocky Balboa a few weeks back was very good tho, I found it hilarious. Plus I love the Tweak 'N' Tweet Connection
Posted by Astatine on Monday, June 29, 2009
btw to carter and pg i never said show is better than cena i just said he doesnt suck:)
Posted by Jordan Hardy on Wednesday, July 01, 2009
good
Posted by tartar on Sunday, July 05, 2009
good
Posted by tartar on Sunday, July 05, 2009
©2005-2010 All rights reserved - Browser Games MD S.r.l. - Posizionamento Motori di Ricerca
Comment # 1
Oh Noez!!! PG rating!!! What will we do?!
Oh wait...Hold on....Nothing's really changed....
Posted by White Wolf on Sunday, June 21, 2009