Comment # 1
i see you've been really rude when criticizing fellow article writers, let me use a quotation from yourself: "...I can't go along and find a point where you really have an opinion that sticks in my head." i see no point in posting this article except for one week of supportership
Posted by wolfmask on Friday, July 18, 2008
Comment # 2
philly the article might have been better if you put more stuff in it it was somewhat short
Posted by tbrhe on Friday, July 18, 2008
Comment # 3
What??? I re-read the article like two times and I am not even sure what it was about. That article made absolutely no sense what so ever.
Posted by Harrison James on Friday, July 18, 2008
Comment # 4
Hate to correct you but there was an ECW tag match with Impact Players vs ??? (maybe bWo), in which 2 wrestlers hit simultaneous superkicks. . . it was sloppy but it has been done.
Posted by The Brick on Friday, July 18, 2008
Comment # 5
Too short.
No point. Lame.
Posted by Vince on Friday, July 18, 2008
Comment # 6
I'm embarrassed to call this an artic.e. Take it down Glide.
Posted by The Philadelphia Phighter on Friday, July 18, 2008
Comment # 7
Sorry but really what was the point in running down tag matches...everyone knows what happens because its almost always the same thing no need to tell us about it in an article...no offence i like your articles but this one lacked a point
Posted by Shogun on Friday, July 18, 2008
Comment # 8
very good article best I've seen well the thing I like is it's length.
Posted by ZLW on Friday, July 18, 2008
Comment # 9
wow ZLW have you seen the other articles?(sorry TPP lol)
Posted by Shogun on Friday, July 18, 2008
Comment # 10
Come on guys, this is a good article, its true and short so, i think its a good article :)
Posted by Monkey King 4 Ever on Friday, July 18, 2008
Comment # 11
jhjhjhj
Posted by bagli on Friday, July 18, 2008
Comment # 12
how to learn skills
Posted by Bagli on Friday, July 18, 2008
Comment # 13
I kinda dug the article but yeah it kinda needed a little extra sauce or spice, probably woulda been a good short blog but I guess the TWG punters desire more substance in there articles. Anyways looking forward to next time TPP. You guys that are being nasty, chill, everyone makes mistakes tis how we grow and learn, otherwise none of us would have ever walked :P Peace
Posted by Yuri on Friday, July 18, 2008
Comment # 14
Sucked...bigtime.
Posted by The One on Friday, July 18, 2008
Comment # 15
keep up the good work
Posted by Wrecking Ball on Friday, July 18, 2008
Comment # 16
Short and simple but no pictures!?????!
Posted by Jake Temple on Friday, July 18, 2008
Comment # 17
Good Job:)
Posted by Jose Cena on Friday, July 18, 2008
Comment # 18
it doesn't need to be taken down, it needs to be expanded. we all agree that tag matches are somehow predictable, but how does it impact on the current tag team division in wwe, since apparently there might be a revival after the match at the gab?
Posted by wolfmask on Friday, July 18, 2008
Comment # 19
The title of this article is "The Ending of a Tag Team Match." Now you described how all tag matches end, and of course you're right. All matches pretty much end this way. However, you did not tell us if you like or dislike this ending, and we think you're trying to give us a reason not to watch another tag match ever again. You gave us no conclusion to what you think should have been done, if anything at all. This is definitely an incomplete article, and needs revision before I can call it acceptable. I do however like like the RAW segment you added. That kind of stuff I don't think ever goes old. Would be better if Stone Cold was around not to listen to the McMahons however, but I can't blame that one on you Phighter.... or can I??
Posted by The Ripper on Friday, July 18, 2008
Comment # 20
This article made me realize how predictable tag matches are. They really do end the same way. The WWE needs to change things up when it comes to tag team wrestling.
Posted by JCR on Friday, July 18, 2008
Comment # 21
Start Preaching What Your Teaching
Posted by Cody Roark on Saturday, July 19, 2008
Comment # 22
lamelamelamelamelame
Posted by Vince on Saturday, July 19, 2008
Comment # 23
Phighter - I hate to criticise, but I was really looking forward to reading this, and now I wish I hadn't. Hope your next instalment is longer and has a point :)
Posted by TMP on Saturday, July 19, 2008
Comment # 24
TPP: I hope you proofread before you post your article. The grammatical errors are distracting. Besides that, an OK post.
Posted by Mono on Sunday, July 20, 2008
Comment # 25
whaty
Posted by rabmaliv on Friday, July 25, 2008
Comment # 26
my name explains it
Posted by worst article ever on Saturday, July 26, 2008
Comment # 27
Too short, good article, but to short.
Posted by Max X on Thursday, July 31, 2008
|