do you want to try the wrestling game ?

Share on Facebook

War Report: January 4th, 2009

War Report – Monday 4th January 2010

Ladies and gentlemen... I’m afraid to say that because The Nemesis’ article was frankly excellent (and I don’t have anything else really to add, or indeed change) then I’m not going to be doing a negative report of the year’s catastrophes.  They can be summed up in two words.

Abraham Washington

Ok so that’s not all, but read Nem’s article, he’s got it all covered.  The worrying part is, Abe’s actually improved since he started.  Seriously!  Take a look at some of his first shows on youtube, he can barely speak.  Actually, don’t.  Just take my word for it.  Don’t put yourself through that.  In fact I’m slightly sickened that his name stands out above this paragraph.

Anyway, instead of talking about 2009, I thought I should have a look at what could be a defining moment of the decade, as far as wrestling is concerned.  Monday the 4th of January, 2010.  The day that TNA competed with RAW, and let’s be honest, they put on the better show.  The segments may not all have been WWE standard, with the usual holes you’d expect (I’ll talk about them later) but the matches were better and the Steel Asylum is definitely innovative as a concept.

Before I go any further, I should mention that I’ve watched a full episode of TNA maybe twice before.  I’ve got the same access to it as I have to the WWE, probably better in some cases, as I’ve relied solely on YouTube to get my wrestling fixes over the past couple of year.  WWE occasionally blocks matches – never the big ones, but usually ones involving McIntyre or Kofi, for some reason.

The main reason TNA could be successful

The talent in TNA is about the same level as in the WWE.  Ok so the backstage segments are a bit shaky, but you can always just look at the dress Christy Hemme’s wearing and you’re sorted.  In terms of wrestling talent, TNA has 4 strong divisions.

1)      Heavyweights - Matt Morgan, Samoa Joe, Hernandez, Desmond Wolfe and Christopher Daniels could viably go for the title at some point this year as far as I can tell, and that’s just the younger guys.  AJ Styles and Kurt Angle put on a very good match, and that makes a strong heavyweight division.  There are also Lashley, Abyss, Dinero (Burke) and Eric Young (who I’ve not seen but is a champion).  It’s a good heavyweight division, it’s not as strong as the WWE, but it definitely has potential.

2)      X division - which I guess must be like the Cruiserweight division, that now has the addition of Jeff Hardy (!) which came out of the blue, while there are also guys like the champion Amazing Red, Homicide, Homicide and the Motor City Machine Guns, Alex Shelley and Chris Sabin.  All of them seem exciting, and definitely worth watching.  The WWE has no Cruiserweight division, other than Bourne.

3)      Tag division – The Dudleys, MCMGs, British Invasion, Beer Money, Lethal Consequences.  Yes, I realise that’s 5 teams.  Not very much?  Let’s look at the WWE.  Cryme Tyme, Hart Dynasty, DX, Legacy, Baretta and Croft.  That’s 5 official teams over 3 shows, 6 if you count Big Show and whoever he’s with this week.  TNA appears to have a stronger tag division.

4)      Knockouts – TNA’s women’s division is so strong they can have a singles and a tag division, and it doesn’t look forced or ridiculous.  Not only that, but they’ve got girls who can actually wrestle!  We haven’t seen that in the WWE since... Victoria.  Incidentally, Victoria’s here, and looking good.  Why she had to spend her last weeks with the WWE jobbing to the Bellas I’ll never know.  The WWE’s diva’s division is a joke.  It maybe shouldn’t be as they have some decent divas really (Phoenix, Melina, Maryse, Gail Kim, McCool, Katie Lea and Natalya) but they’re spread across the 3 shows.  TNA has the likes of Awesome Kong, Tara (Victoria), Hamada, Taylor Wilde and Sarita.  All of them looked great in the ring, and I’m assuming there’s at least a couple more in there that can wrestle.  Also, Velvet Sky... hot!

The remainder seem to be old guys, whether they’ve just drafted them in or not.  If I’m honest, I’ve no idea who the Nasty Boys are, but at least one of them looks like he’s about to have a coronary.  Mick Foley, Sting, the nWo (X-Pac, Hall, Nash and Hogan), Jarrett, Rhino, Steiner, Richards, Raven and Ric Flair are all part of the company.  This represents the biggest problem that TNA is likely to face, and that is simply that all of these guys are going to want air time.  This isn’t going to be the case so much for the likes of Rhino, Stevie Richards, Raven or Tommy Dreamer when he inevitably ends up there, but that is a LOT of ego to have in one show.  Add Eric Bischoff to the mix and you have to doubt that TNA can contain all of these guys for much longer than a few months.

The thing is, if that all blows up on-screen then it could make for some interesting viewing.  If it happens behind the scenes, which is much more likely, then the show’s going to suffer.  As I’ve mentioned, there is a LOT of talent in TNA at the moment.  If you start sacrificing their air time to make way for all of the former WWF/E wrestlers, the ones who had their day AT LEAST 15 years ago, then you’re going to be struggling to maintain the audience’s interest. 

Just look at the WWE for the casing point.  Their main attractions are guys who they’ve clearly just run out of storylines for – The Undertaker, Triple H and Shawn Michaels are all title holders.  They’ve never stopped pushing John Cena, which is why the crowd occasionally get on his back (like this past RAW) and basically we’re sick of him.  Unfortunately, the kids aren’t.  He’s like The Rock or Stone Cold minus the charisma.  He can talk, yes, but he just doesn’t have that ability to make you laugh like The Rock (still love that sketch where he offers Lillian Garcia some of his... strudel) or the attitude of Stone Cold.  Natural showmanship is something you can’t learn.  Luckily for the WWE, however, they have The Miz.  Unfortunately for the WWE, there doesn’t appear to be an easy way to make him a loveable character.  Morrison’s great in the ring, but his mic skills seem to have fallen away since the days of The Dirt Sheet.  The WWE has a lot of potentially great wrestlers, but few potentially great showmen.  The next 5 years have to be the years of Edge, Jericho, Miz, Morrison, Orton, DiBiase and Kingston.  Maybe Sheamus.

TNA has to avoid the trap of turning to the veterans to pull out a good show and keep trusting the talent it’s created on its own.  If the main events start becoming full of the likes of Flair, Foley and the nWo, then their ratings are going to fall pretty quickly.  They need the excitement their younger stars can bring and use the veterans as sparingly as they can, just using them really to help along the younger guys. 

What TNA also need to do now is start attracting the unhappy (but still relatively young) talent from the WWE.  I’m talking about the likes of Charlie Haas, who’s not been seen on TV for months.  Other candidates are Matt Hardy, Shelton Benjamin, MVP and Chavo Guerrero.  An obvious choice though, is Mr Kennedy.  I’m also talking about someone like Kane, who’s been woefully misused for years, and I feel has lost all credibility in the WWE since the Khali debacle.  He’s losing his legs and his movement’s not what it once was, but he’s still got another couple of years left in him and would also draw in some of the WWE fans.  At this point I should also say RIP Umaga – someone who would have done a great job in TNA

The Simple Things

If TNA is going to beat the WWE, then they have a simple way to go about it.  As the WWE is now the PG generation that we all know isn’t as entertaining as wrestling should be, they need to offer us something similar to the Attitude era.  They have the personnel to do it, you just have to wonder if they have the writers to do it.  The obvious way to draw some support in is by getting all of the ECW guys together when Dreamer arrives and have some real ECW action.  That’ll bring in almost everyone who’s been turned off by the insipid writing caused by changing the core demographic from late teens and 20-somethings to pre-teens.

Another simple thing they’ve already done is get the timing right.  If you’re going to go to war with RAW, as they’ve decided to do, they’ve done absolutely the right thing in putting themselves on one hour before RAW starts.  That way, if you can watch 2 hours of TNA, you can watch 2 hours of (nearly all) good wrestling, assuming they do that right.  Meanwhile, you get to miss out on whoever this week’s guest host is trying to sell whatever it is they’re trying to sell to you.  And they are ALWAYS trying to sell something to you.  Then you get to miss whatever rubbish the Divas are doing, and a mediocre match involving someone like Carlito, Henry or Masters.  I mean, those guys are all fine and decent enough to watch, but put them up against any of the likely TNA main events and I’d take TNA every time.

Back to the 4th, which I guess I haven’t really covered in all that much detail.  TNA’s card looked like this:

Steel Asylum Match (like a cell with a hole in the top, means you have to climb up and then across to escape)  – Homicide, Jay Lethal, Consequences Creed, Chris Sabin, Amazing Red, Alex Shelley, Suicide, Kiyoshi

Jeff Hardy arrives at the end of the match and takes out Homicide.  Shannon Moore’s with him backstage a little later.

ODB vs. Tara

Foley, Ric Flair, Scott Hall, Waltman and Bischoff arrive.  Sting’s around somewhere as well (apparently he’s returning)

Awesome Kong and Hamada vs. Sarita and Taylor Wilde

The Beautiful people and Sean Morley (Val Venis) play strip poker, Nasty Boys arrive

Hernandez and Matt Morgan vs. Stevie Richards and Raven (w/Daffney) – Raven botched a save so we didn’t see much Hernandez

Orlando Jordan interrupts a Dinero interview

D’Angelo Dinero vs. Desmond Wolfe

Abyss vs. Samoa Joe

Kurt Angle vs. AJ Styles

Now, this might not look absolutely fantastic, but every single match was better than what the WWE would be able to put on at each level.  It was also better than the WWE’s offering that night:

Shawn Michaels and Bret Hart reconcile

Maryse vs. Brie Bella

MVP vs. Mark Henry vs. Jack Swagger vs. Carlito

DX vs. JeriShow

Sheamus vs. Evan Bourne

Randy Orton vs. Kofi Kingston

Bret Hart gets kicked in the groin by Vince

Tell me which you’d rather see.  If you disagree I’d honestly like to see why.  I’ve been a WWE fan for a long time now, and what they come up with today really disappoints me, while TNA has offered me an alternative that’s exciting and has better technical wrestling for the most part.

I’m quite excited for TNA, and as long as they keep the formula right, keep aiming at the audience the WWE is missing completely, then they could really turn some heads and do some solid business.  In about 5 years or so the WWE will most likely try to take them over, or will put its weight back into making an Attitude Era II, but for now I’m hoping to enjoy the new TNA ride.

I’ve been The General, over and out.

Discuss it on the wrestling forum

Comments

  1. Comment #1

    i completly agree but i wish the asylum match didnt turn out so lame

    Posted by anime crazed on Tuesday, January 19, 2010

  2. Comment #2

    the WWE needs a new Evolution with Batista as an Animal Heel, not his new Heel gimmick, it sucks

    Posted by unknow on Wednesday, January 20, 2010

  3. Comment #3

    That was the first Asylum match I've seen and i was disappointed. You could hardly see anything going on in the ring, and I didn't see any high spots. And to top it off the finish was absolutely lame (but kinda funny wen they all got up to chase homicide :P )

    Posted by The Destructornator on Wednesday, January 20, 2010

  4. Comment #4

    i agree that the asylum match could have a better ending to it.

    One thing i dont like now, is that they've changed the ring into the square 4-sided ring. Damn Hogan and Eric! Now does this means that the steel asylum match and ultimate X match is gone forever? Thats a wrong direction to go for sure.

    They're giving more and more air time to those old and boring characters. i.e. hogan, foley, etc. I want more quality wrestling, not some forgotten old man talking shit.

    Other than that, great article!

    Posted by 1221 on Wednesday, January 20, 2010

  5. Comment #5

    I dont agree at all. TNA has never been able to get my vote because of the amateuristic camera work/lighting and such. I can't watch a show that is badly filmed. It just annoys me. That and they sign guys like Hall, Waltman and the Nasty Boys ffs, who cares about them? I'd take Vince McMahon promo over ANY promo TNA has to offer for example.

    My biggest complaint about the WWE is that DX is getting about 1/3 of the air time on every show.

    Posted by Keown on Wednesday, January 20, 2010

  6. Comment #6

    Velvet Sky is beautiful indeed. very.

    Posted by Sommerlund on Wednesday, January 20, 2010

  7. Comment #7

    The Steel Asylum match ended in dq because none of the wrestlers in the match could climb out the top. Homocide was supposed to after the dq, but he failed.

    I like the move to the four-sided ring, because as Hogan said in an interview, with the four-sided ring you can get more speed and momentum built up as opposed to the six-sided ring. I have a feeling that this does mean the end for the steel asylum, but that's really not too bad considering the fact that they're aren't very many wrestlers who have the upper-body strength to escape through the top after going through a match. As far as ultimate-x is concerned, though, they can still have them, because the ultimate-x set-up only uses four corners of the ring anyway.

    I personally love TNA and I love the fact that they are taking on the WWE and I think that bringing in new characters to shake things up is a genious idea. I have no problem with the older guys being in the company, as long as the main events are for the younger guys. I like Flair as AJ's "manager/mentor" and I read that TNA is building to a Flair-Sting feud. While neither Flair nor Sting are anywhere near their prime, they are both great characters in my opinion and Sting is excellent on the mic (flair isn't bad either except when he gets excited and looks like he is about to have a heart attack). And while they are both "old" wrestling is in both of their blood and it's what they live to do. There won't be many "high-spots" in the matches, but there should be good technical wrestling, which you never see in the WWE anymore. I feel that Sting is still good enough in the ring to carry Flair through some pretty good matches.

    With all that being said my opinion is that for TNA to pass WWE in every aspect, they need to focus on the younger and "high-flying" talent for the main events, while strategically using the older guys as "managers" and mid-card type talents. I think the big names like Flair, Sting, Hogan, Foley, etc. will draw fans in while the guys like AJ, Joe, Daniels, Dinero, Hernandez, Morgan, etc will keep the fans hooked.

    Sorry for that long rant and I'm not trying to steal your thunder General, but i wanted to give my opinion.

    Great article!

    Posted by The Best Sting Ever on Wednesday, January 20, 2010

  8. Comment #8

    To let some people know the ultimate X can be used in a 4 sided ring and has done before in the beginning of TNA.
    TNA have things that WWE dont have, you can dis the promos all you want but most of the matches are kick ass like nearly every AJ styles match :p

    So my vote goes for TNA

    Posted by Jason Callahan on Wednesday, January 20, 2010

  9. Comment #9

    I dont like this report as its one sided. However I have to agree. TNA are taking WWE greats.

    Posted by TGI on Wednesday, January 20, 2010

  10. Comment #10

    yer i gotta say tna is alot better but if they put it to 4 side like hulk hogan and eric want it to be there gonna lose alot more ratting tna is the 6 side the greates match were made because of the 6 side ring for istansts the ultimate x

    Posted by kid jag on Friday, January 22, 2010

  11. Comment #11

    Just wanted to point out that Jeff Hardy hasn't joined TNA, a lot of rumors are stating that he won't join them (at least, not yet anyway). And besides, Hardy can be much, MUCH bigger at WWE than he could ever be at TNA.

    But that is merely because WWE has a strong fanbase than TNA does.

    Oh, and I'd vote for WWE for two reasons.

    1) The editor is a biased idiot.

    2) WWE is a more better product, even if it is PG rated. Bloddy idiots whoever came up with that.

    Posted by Penguin on Monday, January 25, 2010

Leave a comment

Please Keep your comments appropriate, and PG rated at all times. Any comment that violates the game rules will be deemed spam, and won't be published.