TNA Epics & WWE Superstars's Ratings
As you might know, TNA has re-launched its Thursday night show called TNA Epics. This show's first season was ended three months from it's start and last Thursday debuted on Spike TV.
And now to the ratings. TNA Epics which followed TNA iMPACT! (1.3 cable rating) managed to gain a good 0.7 cable rating.
On the other hand, WWE Superstars scored a 0.8 rating with its replay later in the evening gaining a 0.3 cable rating.
Source: ewrestlingnews.com
Discuss it on the wrestling forum
Comments
Leave a comment
- Another Jericho Update
- TNA Star To Jump to WWE
- WWE Attempts to Correct Error By Laurinaitis
- SmackDown Wrestler Taking A Break?
- Wrestler Done With TNA?
- Over The Limit Results 5/20
- Flair Gone From TNA?
- A lot of People Not Happy With 3-Hour RAW
- TNA Interested In Morrison and Melina
- WWE Wrestler's Return
- WWE Begins It's Future Endeavors List For 2010 2010-1-9
- Sting's TNA Future 2010-1-12
- TNA To Make Permanent Move To Mondays? 2010-1-6
- Speculated Royal Rumble Card 2010-1-7
- WWE Title Holder Injured 2010-1-21
- Huge Name to Host Raw 2 Weeks Before Wrestlemania 2010-1-16
- WWE Superstars By Age 2010-1-21
- TNA Star Marries Knockout 2010-1-10
- Former WWE Star Interested in TNA 2010-1-17
- Raw edited for Australian Television 2010-1-8
Comment #1
So Superstars is doing better than TNA? A show with only 2 matches?
Posted by on Saturday, January 16, 2010
Comment #2
Might be because Superstars is new matches and Epics is a reply type show, Epics will flux in the ratings depending on who they showcase.
Posted by on Sunday, January 17, 2010
Comment #3
Or because TNA struggles for everything they get whereas the WWE name is more recognizable to casual fans.
Posted by on Sunday, January 17, 2010
Comment #4
The return of Mr. Detroit. *facepalm*
Posted by Knox on Sunday, January 17, 2010
Comment #5
Mr Detroit! Awesome, I missed you, man!
Posted by on Sunday, January 17, 2010
Comment #6
Wouldn't it be great if there was nothing but WWE? Other "wrestling" is so pointless. Even if TNA had a good match or segment EVER (yeah right) it wouldn't mean nothing since the WWE name doesn't back it. I often jack off at night looking at Vinny Mac's picture.
Posted by Mr Detoit's gay lover on Sunday, January 17, 2010
Comment #7
Now why would they make A tna epics? really>? really??/ REALLY???
Posted by Tsk..... on Monday, January 18, 2010
Comment #8
Comment #9's got it. The great thing about wrestling is the legacy, the fact that today's wrestlers are competing in the same tradition as yesterday's. That means wrestling in WWE. The WWE name is what gives wrestling it's sense of history, and for that reason TNA will never be able to compete on the same level. The sooner people realize WWE is the only real wrestling, the better.
Posted by Elbib on Monday, January 18, 2010