Inconsistency on WWE's version of Batista's injury
It's been reported that WWE.com's version of Batista's injury may not be so accurate. WWE.com has stated that The Animal's hamstring got injured at Summerslam (same match in which Cena got a neck injury). According to the source, it would have been impossible for a person to have keep on working with a full tear until now. Moreover, as he doesn't wear long trunks the difference between the size of his legs would have been enormous, to the point that the back of one of them would have looked "empty."
Source: www.wrestling-edge.com
Discuss it on the wrestling forum
Comments
Leave a comment
- Duggan/Cryme Tyme Angle Continued 2009-1-5
- Inconsistency on WWE's version of Batista's injury 2008-12-29
- Details On Why Miz & Morrison Won The Tag Titles 2008-12-19
- Umaga In The House?? 2009-1-4
- Hardy & Edge Planned to have a Gimmick Match 2008-12-24
- Jake "The Snake" Roberts on WWE 2008-12-24
- Update on the Batista-fan incident 2008-12-21
- From Wrestling to MMA and back 2009-1-5
- Possible Big Show feud 2008-12-20
- Lita's Band Has A Gig 2009-1-5
Comment #1
is someone else just figuring this out? It's the same with the jaw operaion he had if he really hd loost teeth to Ortons "punt" there would have been blood everywere. It was just a hyped up wisdom tooth extraction. If WWE were as creative with there storylines as there "injurys" It would be a hellova lot better show
Posted by ravan on Monday, December 29, 2008
Comment #2
Impossible to work on a full tear? One you could tear it gradually over time. Two if its a full tear you can still work it just would be extremely painful. Its all about that paycheck at the end of the day.
Posted by PTS on Monday, December 29, 2008