RAW Going 3 Hours
According to the source there is a great possibility that Monday Night RAW will be going live each Monday as a 3 hour show. This would be to counter act the TNA going Live on Mondays.
USA Network is said to be high on the idea, while Stephanie and Vince McMahon are said to be against it. It has been discussed amongst WWE officials for some time. There is also the chance of keeping the Guest Host angle going.
Source: pwpix.net
Discuss it on the wrestling forum
Comments
Leave a comment
- Wresltemania 26 Location Revealed 2010-1-30
- No End In Sight For WWE? 2010-1-28
- Honky Tonk Man Refuses HOF Induction 2010-1-28
- Breaking: TNA Permanently moving to Monday 2010-1-28
- WWE Legends Unemployed? 2010-2-7
- 2 Hall Of Fame Inductees Revealed 2010-2-9
- Jeff Hardy Going Full-Time? 2010-2-7
- TNA Global Title Changes Hands 2010-1-28
- Update on Joey Mercury's Return 2010-2-6
- Possible Change To TNA PPV Schedule 2010-1-26
Comment #1
Im excited for it if it happens but i know itll be hard to pull off idk how long WWE can keep at it
Posted by Shynobi on Sunday, January 31, 2010
Comment #2
3 hours will mean an earlier start time Johnny it wont effect school for you. It would be to counter TNA being on for an hour before RAW comes on
Posted by Get a clue and once you have it, get it explained down to you IQ level on Sunday, January 31, 2010
Comment #3
yes i think this is a smart decision on wwe soon wwe is not going to have great performers like shawn michaels and Undertaker and then they wont know what to do. wwe was the best years ago one match that we never saw and hate that wwe never did this match Hbk vs the rock but the rivalry between hbk and hhh was classic and who can forget survior series 2005 Team Raw vs Team Smackdown
Posted by matt cavallo on Sunday, January 31, 2010
Comment #4
3 hours with WWE bookers?
That's not WWE.. that's WCW.
Posted by xXx on Sunday, January 31, 2010
Comment #5
Why not make a 'SMACKDOWN' go for 3 hrs. It is the more exciting show after all.
Posted by Skilourt on Sunday, January 31, 2010
Comment #6
Even though I have hated WWE/F ever since 2004, I had kept watching it cause I had watched it for so long. The Guest host angle, has actually made me stop watching WWE.. get rid of it, horrible idea.
Posted by on Sunday, January 31, 2010
Comment #7
They use popular guest hosts that have nothing to do with wrestling to attract the fans of the guest host. Nothing else.
Posted by Antary on Sunday, January 31, 2010
Comment #8
It says Vince is against the idea... it's the network that's suggesting it. Vince probably knows TNA is no competition at all and even if they start 1 hour earlier than Raw, Raw would still get the most ratings.
Posted by on Sunday, January 31, 2010
Comment #9
WWE can't produce a quality 2 hour show, god knows how bad a 3 hour should would be
Posted by Stevo on Sunday, January 31, 2010
Comment #10
the weird thing in that news is how WWE thinks keeping the Guest host thing is a good Idea.
3 Hours guest hosts sound to me like a reason to watch TNA
Posted by MagicGis on Sunday, January 31, 2010
Comment #11
With RAW being 2 hours we average about 10 minutes wrestling and the rest punks running their mouth. Now we can bump wrestling up to 12 minutes!
Posted by on Sunday, January 31, 2010
Comment #12
3 hour Raw? For gawd's sake then give us MORE wrestling, LESS chat then! And no more blink and miss it matches that are over quicker than a hiccup (to quote J,R) I agree make Smackdown the three hour show, it is the BETTER show now and for me the companies Flag ship. Heck you can get more wrestling in an episode of Superstars then you get on Raw.
Posted by barbedwire on Sunday, January 31, 2010
Comment #13
Don't have a problem at all with 3 hours that means more action and more superstars can have face time and more time to make the show better. Not sure but honestly I think 3 shows is ridiculous its time to shut ECW down since its the least show watched and ECW title has no real value anymore
Posted by beerguy on Sunday, January 31, 2010
Comment #14
3 shows, no sir you miscount. It's 4, raw, smackdown, ECW and Superstars.
I agree one should close or better yet merge, just mix ECW and Superstars and do what they were rumoured to be doing some time ago, and that's make ECW 2 hours.
Posted by barbedwire on Sunday, January 31, 2010
Comment #15
go to gerweck.net for up-to-date wrestling news. I read about this way earlier than this.
Posted by Mikey Ramirez on Monday, February 01, 2010
Comment #16
Ok, first things first, if you're going to watch wrestling on Monday nights, then you would be better off watching either TNA or ROH. The WWE has been doing nothing but going downhill for the past 10 years. The main reason for this is the fact that the WWE keeps using all these old school wrestlers and ignoring the newer talent. While I agree that people like Shawn Michaels, the Undertaker, and HHH were great back in the day, they are all past their prime. I actually like the ECW show because there is actual new, young talent on there. The fact that they made the ECW title more of a consolation prize for wrestlers who haven't held the belt but should have really sucks. No matter who the WWE has, though, they cannot keep up with talent like TNA and ROH have. Need me to name a few? AJ Styles, Christopher Daniels, Bryan Danielson (yeah, I know he has signed with the WWE, but they will just screw him completely up), Austin Aries, Roderick Strong, the Motor City Machineguns, Abyss, etc.
Posted by Runwiththewolf on Monday, February 01, 2010
Comment #17
now if they moved kozlov to raw and he had a russian manager with a mustach like krukov on CC&Red alert 3 than they can come up with some bad ass story lines...!!!
Posted by VLADIMIR KOZLOV on Monday, February 01, 2010