WWE RAW and TNA Impact Head-To-Head Ratings Week 2

Monday 3/15/10

WWE RAW: 3.7 cable rating

TNA Impact: 0.8 cable rating

Last Week: RAW: 3.4 cable rating, TNA: 1.0 cable rating

Source: ewrestlingnews.com

Discuss it on the wrestling forum

Comments

Comment #1

@26: Jackasses in tights? No, that's Pro Wrestling Guerrilla. Well, mostly just Super Dragon. But PWG is the crap fed, not CHIKARA.

Posted by OctoberRaven on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #2

"Wrestling fan"... People still use this argument? It seems people seem to forget one aspect of being a pro-wrestler, it's a job. Just because you quit or are fired from a job in your feild, doesn't mean you never work again. Put yourself in the shoes of a pro-wrestler. You work for WWE, make decent money but one day you lose your job. What would you do? Just never wrestle again cause of loyalty to the brand you're not longer in? No, you would look for work. Obviously another federation will end up picking you up since your name has some fame behind it now from being in WWE, this is only natural. I remember during the attitude era people said this kind of stuff and I had to point out how most of WWE/F was former ECW guys, but no one seemed to complain. Now, I'll agree about the REALLY old wrestlers simply because in ring they are limited to what they can do, but doesn't mean they should go jobless. Understand what you're talking about in more in depth and realistic way kids.

Posted by TV's Frank on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #3

o.O give up TNA your no match for WWE.. WWE needs to bring back the Peoples Champ The Rock everyone will go their and ull see tna ratings 0.1 lol..
TNA should compete with something their lvl maybe NXT

Posted by on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #4

response to #36

-

Vince and Bret are just as old as Hogan and Flair... at least Hogan and Flair are (were) wrestlers

Posted by the dude on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #5

ps - TNA's ratings didn't go down from last week... they are the same. It was just rounded up to a 1.o as it would be this week

Posted by the dude on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #6

As I predicted in the last "let's combine ratings" article, TNA has yet again failed to trump WWE. This should the people running TNA the clue to back off Monday night before they fail entirely. And if there is a replay Thursday, please do NOT post an article saying that they have a combined rating of something less than WWE's and say how great it is.

Posted by OneUp on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #7

NXT would beat out TNA no problem ppl love NXT

Posted by lol on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #8

TNA fail lolz

Posted by Kuvey A on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #9

COMON DUDES TNA IS BETTER EVERY THING ABOUT WWE IS "PG" AND IT SUCKS I MEAN THERE NOT GONNA GET ANYWHERE DOIN THIS IT SUCKS THE "WRESTLING" THAT THEY "TRY" TO DO S-U-C-K-S!
TNA IS GENUINE FIGHTIN I MEAN IF A GUY IN WWE BLEEDS THE GET MAD AND IN TNA THERE GOIN UP AND HIGHER DOIN INNOVATIVE THINGS

PEOPLE OPEN YOUR EYES IF YOU WANNA TRULY BE INTERESTED TNA THE REAL WRESTLING IS THE PLACE T-O G-O!

Posted by Abyss X on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #10

It i caused because on Raw was STeve Austin and there are 2 weeks left to wrestlemania. I am sure that 2-3 weeks after wm tna will have rating 1.3-1.5

Posted by Margera on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #11

Good

Posted by Orton on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #12

haha suck on that tna

Posted by .... on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #13

Once again, it's just because WWE has a larger base established, many WWE fans are, let's face it, not real wrestling fans so barely even know TNA exists. Those that do blow it off right away because they are 12 year olds who think being "loyal" to one show or another means something. I enjoy both feds, but last two weeks TNA's shows have been far better.

Posted by TV's Frank on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #14

TNA has some great WRESTLERS (RVD, Kurt Angle, AJ Styles), but WWE has superior production values and more ENTERTAINING characters who can still put on great matches (HBK, Orton, Jericho). WWE is the better product of the two, without a doubt. TNA reeks of egomania run wild. It's basically the Hulk Hogan show.

Posted by B on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #15

Tell me, what's a "real wrestling fan?" Anyway, all I'm seeing is that TNA can't compete on RAW's level and shouldn't try.

Posted by on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #16

wow last weekk Tna done better then this week
This week wwe sdone better then last week
so that means theres a more demand to watch wwe and if you just hate on me with comments, be my quest because afterall i wont be checking this anyway

Posted by XX on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #17

give up tna you will never beat raw just call it quits go back to thursdays

Posted by TNA SUCKS on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #18

ohh gosh!!!! tna with a tapped show against austin and a packed raw hyping to WM lost viewership than last weeks live show? Incredible! "blah blah tna lossing, obnoxious tna sucks commenting" get over it they'll bounce back

Posted by on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #19

TNA got that rating because people wanted to see Stone Cold.

Posted by Ri2p on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #20

# 10 is right. Even I watched Raw just to see Austin, but after the first match just gave up on it.

Posted by Antary on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #21

I am a big WWE fan. I tried to watch TNA but I just can't get into it. If TNA wants to succeed they should stop trying to cpmpete against WWE and just work on being TNA. TNA shouldn't even think about WWE. They should just keep promoting there product. If they do this they might survive. If they keep trying competing with WWE they will lose their own identity.

Posted by ms mauler on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #22

TNA should give up the whole Monday night take over and go back to Thursday. And I agree with Comment 12: TNA should do its own thing instead or ripping off things the WWE has done. As I told the TNA Fan boys, expect to hear the bell toll for TNA sometime soon if they keep this up. I used to enjoy watching it, except for the constant WWE mentions.

Posted by Chronic Jay on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #23

Austin let me down. There's no stone cold stunner at the end of the show?? Just plain disappointing.

Posted by 1221 on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #24

Ok i like TNA its good and all but if u look at the facts its a whole bunch ofgreat OLD wrestlers trying to live in the glory days one more ime. I mean look at team 3d they can't even breath after one match! They r loosing their orginality i mean i miss the 6 sided ring it was cool and orginal. Jeff Hardy and RVD and Kurt r really the only reason i like to watch it. They r the only reason they got a rating at all. Hulk is to old to wrestle so they lost alot of viewers cause he cant wrestle and who wants to watch washed up wcw. Thats really all it is washed up WCW,ECW, and AWA wrestlers trying to be 20 when they r 40 plus. WWE is the best and i don't see any show that will get close to taking their place.

Posted by Josh on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #25

first i wanna say comment 32 omg HHH VS HBK HIAC Rematch for mania. who souldnt wanna see that!

then as previous comments im confused. i want tna to create its own thing and not keep struggeling to keep up with wwe.

if they keep doing so vince might buy the company.

on the other hand if he does he will make a invasion 2.

and who wouldnt wanna see a jeff vs matt event winning fed gets all after a series of comepetions where it turns into a draw

Posted by Alparslan on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #26

Do pure WWE fans think competition is bad or something? I don't get it. It's like you guys WANT WWE to be a monopoly and there to be no other choices or options in wrestling. All this does (as we have seen since WCW and ECW closed) is bring down the product of your own brand. Whatever though, like I said. Most of you are 12 years olds and don't really understand anyway. *shrugs*

Posted by TV's Frank on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #27

TNA has the better wrestlers, but WWE can do the best, with the badest, and thats why WWE godt higther score. i think... :D

Posted by lolpeople on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #28

WWE just rules guys all you TNA fans out there just suck it up WWE is better than TNA i wouldn't a few of their superstars or WWE like Jeff Hardy, Aj Styles, Kurt Angle and alot others. Or they can just move back to thursday nights

Posted by on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #29

Interesting how people keep saying give up tna but they completely ignore the fact that the wwf got it's ass kicked for years by wcw.

By following your "advice" the wwf would not even exist right now.

Posted by Slappy on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #30

At this rate tna will be out of business in 4 weeks lol

Posted by Vince McMahon on Thursday, March 18, 2010
Comment #31

But TNA wrestling SUCKS. I tried to enjoy their matches, but even moves follow in orders that doesn't even make sense.

Posted by on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #32

Both shows suck equally. WWE has a bigger fanbase, advertisement, and money behind it. Not to mention more people get to see WWE because it's on more accessible networks than Spike.

THAT is why WWE is on top, and will be on top. It's not about which show is better because that's the proverbial giant douche vs turd sammich. If it was truly about show quality, CHIKARA would be the billion-dollar company, and Ultra Mantis Black would be the one shilling Slim Jims.

Come to think of it, UMB shilling Slim Jims would be a really funny thing to see.

Posted by OctoberRaven on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #33

CHIKARA sucks. It's only good if you like watching a bunch of jackasses in wrestling tights.

Posted by on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #34

Sadly I'm beyond the age where I have to support one or the other just for the sake of being loyal. I personally think TNA have had some of the best fights of the year, although they've got some godawful production and some godawful storylines at times

Angle/Wolfe best of three falls late last year was an awesome fight, and Taker/HBK at WM was also a terrific fight. To dismiss either of those just because you're loyal to one or the other would deprive you of a great evening.

Posted by Hayden Sikh on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #35

NXT is only an hour and gets better ratings then TNA, if NXT does better then TNA then I don't know why TNA think they can beat Raw.

Posted by Unknown on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #36

Brand loyalty is stupid, agreed. Then again I'm a pro-wrestling fan, not a TNA fan, not a WWE fan. I watch both programs and enjoy some things and hate some things about both. I'd like to also mention CHIKARA FREAKIN' RULES!

Posted by TV's Frank on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #37

well, this week i watched both shows and i found these things exciting to see: ...first WWE had its moments, stonecold steve austin being one of them obviously coming was something most fans wanted to see, i liked how the vince/bret segment went, austin played that well in his own fashion having the contract signing and then telling vince " oh and one more thing, well, i will let bret tell you" that was priceless when vince turned around and bret had is cast and crutch sitting on the table......but TNA had its moments too, and as a overall show, i thought TNA did rather well with the hall/nash match (even though hall can't wrestle anymore), bischoff getting his head shaved via foley, the angle/anderson matchup..drawing blood, hogan being urged not to wrestle anymore... and rvd wanting revenge from what sting did to him last week, beer money and the jeff jarret as ref angle...TNA will get stronger, as all i saw in WWE was just the same old matches that have been done before and frankly was a bit boring in my opinion, like during the diva's match in WWE, i tuned into TNA to watch the hall/nash segment.

Posted by jason on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #38

It got worse than last week O.o Things are going downhill! And I was really looking forward to WWE actually TRYING to bring a better product... TNA deserves more...

Posted by someone is on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #39

Ok I have watched both shows. I record one while I watch the othe. I will say that TNA is a good show but they are just immiatating the WWE. Sure TNA has some big name wrestlers but most of them are from the past WWE and WCW war days. They are bringing int he PAST not the future. If TNA want to succed they should find NEW wrestlers not WWE/WCW old wrestlers. Come on Flair & Hogan are 60 y/o and Nash is almost 50. That is the attitude era. Supprised they have not tried to get Stone Cold. I will continue to record TNA and watch RAW

Posted by wrestling fan on Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Comment #40

Oh ok josh TNA is all about old wrestlers rying to live in the glory days,forget matt morgan,hernendez,doug williams,rob terry,amazing red,daniels,kaz,aj styles,abyss and all of TNA younger talent. TNA is just about the old guys and if think about it thats all you tna haters keep coming back too is TNA's older talent,god some of you crapped your pants when it was posted that Dave Taylor would be coming on as a agent.

Posted by RavenEX on Thursday, March 18, 2010
Comment #41

No, CHIKARA really is terrible. They're trying to be funny, I guess, but their stuff is really just idiotic.

Posted by on Thursday, March 18, 2010
Comment #42

i wannt to hit you my dog your name is comment# 42 iwant vs you

Posted by tripel h on Thursday, March 18, 2010

WWE RAW and TNA Impact Head-To-Head Ratings Week 2

Comments

Comment #1

Comment #2

Comment #3

Comment #4

Comment #5

Comment #6

Comment #7

Comment #8

Comment #9

Comment #10

Comment #11

Comment #12

Comment #13

Comment #14

Comment #15

Comment #16

Comment #17

Comment #18

Comment #19

Comment #20

Comment #21

Comment #22

Comment #23

Comment #24

Comment #25

Comment #26

Comment #27

Comment #28

Comment #29

Comment #30

Comment #31

Comment #32

Comment #33

Comment #34

Comment #35

Comment #36

Comment #37

Comment #38

Comment #39

Comment #40

Comment #41

Comment #42

Leave a comment